So since a couple of people you've heard of or you know sounded off against homosexuality turned out to be homosexual themselves. We all know about anecdotal evidence.
There is one Freeper here - named scritper - who is too busy currently to spend much time on FR. He is one who used to post many links, as he has done much research on the topic of homosexuality over the years. If you are referring to him, you are worse than blind and are basically slandering a very fine individual.
Your opinion was, and remains, fact free. I have been accused of being a closeted "gay" many times on FR when I managed the Homosexual Agenda pinglist and/or posted on such threads. Nothing could be further from the truth; on the contrary, such an accusation is a classic homosexual agenda promoting talking point.
It was the same with all those Brokeback Mountain threads a few months back. Ironically many of the comments on those thread were probably far more explicit than anything in that movie. It was thoroughly unpleasant to read.
Perhaps they're getting some perverse sexual satisfaction out of doing it, I don't know, but one has to wonder.
You realize, of course, that you are posting in a thread about a man who claimed to be interested in protecting young people from online predators and turned out to be one himself. This type of hypocrisy is common in many fields.
Thank you for your kind words.
It's been about a year since I've heard the statement that it does seem that quite often some of the most vocal ones are big hypocrites. Sure, some may be closeted gays, but that percent is a fraction of 1%. But leave it to somebody with an agenda to blow it out of proportion and try to make it the rule rather than the exception.