[jdm]

If you look up the profile for MAF54 on AOL, there is no profile. Therefore, how would you know that you're talking to a bigshot congressperson? Otherwise, there's no reason to save and archive for use 30 days before the '06 election (remember, these are from '03, allegedly).

[mom4kittys]

very interesting

[Mo1]

read the article at this thread .. then follow the posts I made

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1710815/posts?page=93#93

[Dolphy]

Otherwise, there's no reason to save and archive for use 30 days before the '06 election (remember, these are from '03, allegedly).

I find that pretty odd, along with the time questions you raised. Reading through the IMs quickly though, I'm not sure that Foley looked to conceal his identity. And that too is odd given internet opportunities for anonymous cheap thrills.

[penelopesire]

Ok..just got back from my cocktail with hubby...lol.
You got a point there..however..I get the impression that that XXXXXXXXX(the 'boy') knew exactly who he was talking to and Mr. Foley knew who he was talking to(or thought he did). I actually read a gay guy on one of the 'news' forums saying that it was not unusual that gay people have their first experience with older men(i know it's sick)..but he was acting like it was no big deal. We are going on a big assumption too..that what ABC reported about these PM's being from former 'pages' is true.