Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: defenderSD
"The rights of monogamous traditional marriage are embedded all through our legal statues ..."

The only "right" of married couples I can think of that wouldn't be covered by contract law if the government got out of the business of sanctioning marriages is the right to file a joint tax return. And for that "right", married couples generally pay a penalty!

I'd rather see the government get out of the marriage business than to see its sanction extended to a relationship other than that between one man and one woman.
184 posted on 09/29/2006 1:23:24 PM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: riverdawg

Well IIRC, there are numerous references to marraige, married status, husband, wife, married couples, and parents all throughout family law and divorce law, in addition to tax law and contract law. That's not a subject we all deal with very often but I think if we eliminated the legal definition of marraige or made any definition for marriage legal, then that would throw a lot of chaos and confusion into the legal system.


186 posted on 09/29/2006 1:32:01 PM PDT by defenderSD (The concept of national martyrdom, combined with nuclear weapons, is extremely dangerous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson