To: freedumb2003
Please tell us what it gets wrong.
Iders look at the same evidence but come up with the conclusion that Random mutation plus natural selection cannot produce the complexity of life as we see it. THAT's WHATs wrong. IDers don't go to the Bible at all. Many IDers are agnostic.
To: SirLinksalot
Iders look at the same evidence but come up with the conclusion that Random mutation plus natural selection cannot produce the complexity of life as we see it. THAT's WHATs wrong. IDers don't go to the Bible at all. Many IDers are agnostic. Ah. Agnostic but believing in some sort of Q Continuum interloper. By defintion this is neither falsifiable nor testable.
You have but to produce the Designer for an interview and ID wins the day. But if said Dsigner keeps skulking in the shadows, ID is useless as a scientific idea and fails as a Scientific Theory.
639 posted on
09/28/2006 6:33:09 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
("Critical Thinking"="I don't understand it so it must be wrong.")
To: SirLinksalot; freedumb2003
... Many IDers are agnostic.For example ...
683 posted on
09/28/2006 8:41:37 PM PDT by
Virginia-American
(What do you call an honest creationist? An evolutionist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson