To: Al Simmons
Well, science museums and libraries are overflowing with evidence; when is the 'other side' going to produce any?
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE is the issue. Both sides look at the evidence and come up with different conclusions.
To: SirLinksalot
"THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE is the issue. Both sides look at the evidence and come up with different conclusions."
OK, let me see if I understand:
a. Scientists gather the evidence;
b. Non-scientists then get to interpret it and dismiss the scientists' explanation;
Can someone help me out here? Something seems to be wrong with this analysis but I can't quite put my finger on it......
617 posted on
09/28/2006 6:22:20 PM PDT by
Al Simmons
(Science and Religion are unrelated disciplines and are not philosophically contradictory.)
To: SirLinksalot
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE is the issue. Both sides look at the evidence and come up with different conclusions. OK lets hear yours. This should be a dandy.
619 posted on
09/28/2006 6:23:26 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
("Critical Thinking"="I don't understand it so it must be wrong.")
To: SirLinksalot
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE is the issue.
Just wondering when that other interpretation is going to make an appearance. Or is this what you meant.. ![Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting](http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m107/ml1954/sci.gif)
623 posted on
09/28/2006 6:25:16 PM PDT by
ml1954
(ID = Case closed....no further inquiry allowed...now move along.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson