To: Al Simmons
Well, science museums and libraries are overflowing with evidence; when is the 'other side' going to produce any?
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE is the issue. Both sides look at the evidence and come up with different conclusions.
To: SirLinksalot
"THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE is the issue. Both sides look at the evidence and come up with different conclusions."
OK, let me see if I understand:
a. Scientists gather the evidence;
b. Non-scientists then get to interpret it and dismiss the scientists' explanation;
Can someone help me out here? Something seems to be wrong with this analysis but I can't quite put my finger on it......
617 posted on
09/28/2006 6:22:20 PM PDT by
Al Simmons
(Science and Religion are unrelated disciplines and are not philosophically contradictory.)
To: SirLinksalot
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE is the issue. Both sides look at the evidence and come up with different conclusions. OK lets hear yours. This should be a dandy.
619 posted on
09/28/2006 6:23:26 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
("Critical Thinking"="I don't understand it so it must be wrong.")
To: SirLinksalot
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE is the issue.
Just wondering when that other interpretation is going to make an appearance. Or is this what you meant.. 
623 posted on
09/28/2006 6:25:16 PM PDT by
ml1954
(ID = Case closed....no further inquiry allowed...now move along.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson