There is no other conclusion. You don't get to say "well, 1+1=3 and that is my opinion." You can have an opinion, but you need to defend it if it deals with science.
400 scientists out of how many hundreds of thousands? Every group has a moonbat wing.
Case in point here --- name calling, no evidence presented. No wonder you're not getting anywhere with the majority of Americans.
We have so-called conservatives who fight FOR willful ignorance and embrace and accelerate the dumbing down of America. If "moonbat wing" doesn't fit scientists who should know better, then who can the tag be applied to?
And of course, my underlying point that .0001% or so isn't a meaningful statistic stands.