I'm still waiting for the "evidence" for your claims that man evolved from some lower life form. A picture of a series of skulls didn't impress me in college, and they still don't impress me. I don't understand why you are so ready to accept common decent when the fossil record is sooooo incomplete when it comes to providing those "transitional" fossils that would clearly indicate a progression of skelatal changes which must be there somewhere if common decent is true. IOW, you will keep moving the goal posts.
Is my mind made up? No. Has the evidence been presented as requested? NO!
There is no amount of evidence to "prove" what you are trying to prove. And that has never been a requirement.
You do know that the Atomic Bomb was built based almost completely on theory and inference. Before the first one went off, there was a lot of conjecture on what could happen (up to and including cataclysm).
With your kind of thinking it never would have been built.
The science involved in the making of the Atomic Bomb is hardly in the same realm as that used for evolution. You are comparing apples and oranges in order to try to obtain orangutans.