To: bondserv
My intention is always to highlight what the Bible actually says to remove confusion. Many people who have not spent time reading the Bible only have other peoples idea's of what the Bible says. I laid the scripture out there for all to see, rather than attempt to explain what the Bible says. The passages are abundant and straightforward in their declaration. Your post was pretty heavy handed. You suggest that because you have memorized the words of the Scriptures (I assume in their original languages), that you are somehow excluded from human interpretation.
There are 2 issues here: 1) Scripture is not a source of science and 2) Genesis is open to interpretation (and is contradictary).
The fact people have and do interpret the Bible differently doesn't mean they are wrong.
353 posted on
09/27/2006 7:46:23 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
("Critical Thinking"="I don't understand it so it must be wrong.")
To: freedumb2003
Your post was pretty heavy handed. You suggest that because you have memorized the words of the Scriptures (I assume in their original languages), that you are somehow excluded from human interpretation. Dude,
Where are you getting this stuff. I don't have those passages memorized. I am not trying to impress anyone. Those passages relate specifically to scripture teaching a non-evolutionary beginning to mankind. Don't you agree that it is good to look at the evidence?
I am an admitted irrecoverably flawed individual. My only hope is in the flawless One. He has commissioned me to let others know they are in the same predicament as me. This message tends to tick people off.
365 posted on
09/27/2006 7:57:58 PM PDT by
bondserv
(God governs our universe and has seen fit to offer us a pardon. †)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson