No, it's called "reading and considering the evidence someone has gone throught the trouble of providing you". There is a *lot* to know in even one small branch of science that supports the SToE. I've certainly learned a great deal from the information thoughtful FReepers have posted. Yet I have not *once* seen a CR/ID-er admit that they did not know some bit of information that was provided. Transitional fossil finds or speciation events will be claimed to have never occured, and yet when evidence is provided to the contrary, is there ever an acknowledgment, or an admission of learning something new?
Does your definition of faith include ignoring physical evidence? If it does, you should at least state that from the outset! Admit that no amount of evidence will convince you rather than disingenuously claim that no evidence has been provided. What would Jesus do? I am certain he would do the honest and honorable thing.