[Gargantua]

"...which calls into question your qualification on claiming that any part of it is "doomed"..."

I never, in any posting, claimed that Darwin's Theory is "doomed."

Which calls into question your ability to discern fact from delusion. If you must set up non-existent straw-men to make your point, you're actually ceding that you haven't one. Get a brain, then get a manual which explains how to use it properly... n'kay?

PTBS.

;-/

[Dimensio]

I never, in any posting, claimed that Darwin's Theory is "doomed."

You are correct. I had mistakenly misatttributed someone else's declaration that the theory is "doomed" to you. This does not, however, alter the fact that you attributed elements to the theory that are not actually a part of the theory, which does call into question your credibility when speaking on the theory.

Which calls into question your ability to discern fact from delusion.

My statement was a mistake, not a delusion. Your insults do not lend credibility to your claims.

Get a brain, then get a manual which explains how to use it properly... n'kay?

Insulting me not only does not demonstrate that your claims are factual, but they are also a violation of the terms of usage for this forum.