Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo: 'I Don't Trust the President' on Border Security
CNSNews.com ^ | September 22, 2006 | Kevin Mooney

Posted on 09/22/2006 7:43:18 AM PDT by Dane

Tancredo: 'I Don't Trust the President' on Border Security By Kevin Mooney CNSNews.com Staff Writer September 22, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - An immigration compromise plan will not work, because President Bush cannot be trusted to "certify" America's borders are secure, Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) said Thursday.

In an effort to reconcile the divergent immigration bills in the House and Senate, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) and Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) put forth a compromise plan this summer that would require the president to "certify" the successful implementation of security measures along the most porous entry points into the U.S. before a guest worker program could be implemented.

"I don't trust the president to say the borders are secure," Tancredo told an audience at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. He said immigration policy should be formulated with an emphasis on law enforcement as opposed to "political pandering" for votes. Tancredo also cited a "disconnect" between "elite policy makers" and the American people.

This week, the Senate is considering House legislation that would authorize the construction of 700 miles of reinforced fencing along the most porous sections of America's southwestern border.

Additional measures passed by the House Thursday impose criminal penalties on the construction and financing of border tunnels and provide for expedited removal of criminal aliens. The legislation also "reaffirms the authority" of state and local police to enforce federal immigration laws.

Should the Senate fail to act on border enforcement legislation, Tancredo sees grassroots efforts and citizen activism on the local level as a viable alternative. He would like to see citizen support for strict local laws against illegal immigration and support for pro-enforcement officials at the local level.

Tancredo pointed to a local ordinance in Hazelton, Pa., as an example of the kind of legislation local officials could enact. The ordinance imposes fines and penalties on landlords who rent to illegal aliens and on businesses who hire them.

Similar measures have also passed in other parts of Pennsylvania and in Riverside, N.J.

Tancredo took issue with some conservative strategists - such as Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform - who feel that a push for stringent immigration policies could hurt the Republican Party politically.

"I don't buy it," Tancredo said. "By saying we should be a nation of laws, we will gain votes."

As evidence, Tancredo pointed to Proposition 200 in Arizona, which requires government employees to verify the immigration status of people applying for benefits. Tancredo noted that law was enacted with support from 47 percent of the state's Hispanics.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; atzlan; borders; crime; danehatesamerica; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; invasion; meglomania; reconquista; tancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-252 next last
To: MNJohnnie
Immigration is AN issue. IT is NOT THE issue no matter how many manufacture polls various activist groups put together to validate their own opinions. Americans have a number of things they want delt with. A crowd of people who ONLY can scream endlessly about Immigration is NOT going to go anywhere in American politics.

Actually, they have brought the politics of the issue to the point where the house and senate are ready to pass enforcement first bills despite the concerted opposition of the entire dem party and 90% of the power brokers in the rep party. I'd say that they have gotten somewhere, with Tom being entitled to a lion's share of the credit.

As to your other points, of course a party is a coalition and does a bunch of stuff. Some are more important. Some are less important. It's my opinion, this is one of the three or four key issues today. Tom has helped save the republican party from it's short-sighted money interests.

101 posted on 09/22/2006 9:47:46 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Invisible Gorilla
Do you think it's been wise for the President to repeatedly rock the boat with his efforts to legalize illegal aliens?

He's against amnesty and you know it; what good is your agenda if you have to lie about it?

102 posted on 09/22/2006 9:49:42 AM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota
Nope. Not Crazy...and perfect common sense. However, many here would probably be upset with the "guest worker" part of your proposal. That said, I support it.

I think the only thing that Tancredo does that hurts him is to forget the Reagan mantra of not speaking ill of fellow GOPers. He could do the exact same thing without making it personal. Once he does that, he falls into McCain territory.

But no worries. I am confident that things will turn out better on this than many expect.
103 posted on 09/22/2006 9:49:53 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

By your thinking then, anyone who doesn't trust President Bush on border security doesn't trust him on any other issue?
"All or nothing"? Sorry Howlin, not buying it today. Or tomorrow. Or in November.


104 posted on 09/22/2006 9:50:12 AM PDT by tumblindice (close the damn border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
What an ugly, UGLY thing to say! You should be ashamed.

Why is that ugly, ulgy, yet those on you who hang out on these threads call anybody who doesn't march in lockstep with your "Open Border Lovers?"

Can you explain that to me???

105 posted on 09/22/2006 9:50:44 AM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

If so few people regard illegal immigration as an important problem, why waste your time even posting on this topic? We're a tiny, insignificant minority, right?


106 posted on 09/22/2006 9:50:45 AM PDT by ruination ((Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Open Borders Derangement Syndrome.”))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dane
In my eyes, it's not a matter of trust in the President.
It's a matter of agreeing or disagreeing with his policies.

I trust the President to do what he says he will do. This is not the President saying he will "certify" the borders security. This is a bill saying the President will "certify" the borders security before instituting a "guest worker" program.
If the President says he WILL certify the borders security, I trust the President, this one at least, to do so.

Do I agree with all the Presidents immigration policies? No.
Do I trust him to do what he says he will do? Yes.

107 posted on 09/22/2006 9:51:41 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruination; Howlin
If so few people regard illegal immigration as an important problem, why waste your time even posting on this topic? We're a tiny, insignificant minority, right?

Uh, a very loud and irrational minority, (i.e tom tancredo acting like jesse jackson and al sharpton, IMO).

108 posted on 09/22/2006 9:53:25 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
By your thinking then, anyone who doesn't trust President Bush on border security doesn't trust him on any other issue? "All or nothing"?

Are you new to these threads? Most of the posters on these threads despise George W. Bush.

And anybody with eyes can see Tancredo has NO OTHER ISSUE.

109 posted on 09/22/2006 9:54:15 AM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ruination
If so few people regard illegal immigration as an important problem, why waste your time even posting on this topic?

Because the lies bother me, that's why. It makes FR look foolish.

110 posted on 09/22/2006 9:55:31 AM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

Thank you for a most excellent and fair post!


111 posted on 09/22/2006 9:56:09 AM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Which "lies" do you mean?


112 posted on 09/22/2006 9:57:01 AM PDT by ruination ((Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Open Borders Derangement Syndrome.”))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"Are you new to these threads?
Most of the posters on these threads despise President Bush."

No.
That's not true. He "walks like John Wayne" on every other issue. But on this issue, he walks behind Vincente Fox.


113 posted on 09/22/2006 9:57:48 AM PDT by tumblindice (close the damn border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: standingfirm
He's our guy, conservative and the one of few lone voices on immigration law enforcement

He is your guy and he is trying to see to it that the Democrats get elected. That way you can have the problem cured by making sure all Mexican Citizens are free to legally travel and live any where in the USA.

Any one who things that the Democrats are going to make it better for your side a couple of french fries short of a happy meal.... served of course by a MEXICAN.

The Choice is Bush or the Democrats.. and Tancredo has chosen the Democrats.

114 posted on 09/22/2006 9:58:03 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dane

The gall, expecting the president to do his job. /sarcasm


115 posted on 09/22/2006 9:58:20 AM PDT by exnavy (God bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
But on this issue, he walks behind Vincente Fox.

It's statements like that that are why you all are summarily dismissed.

116 posted on 09/22/2006 9:58:46 AM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ruination

Sorry, not playing.

Find somebody else to recite your talking points to.


117 posted on 09/22/2006 9:59:15 AM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
But on this issue, he walks behind Vincente Fox.

And you are behind Vicente watching him swaggering" to make that obvesation, correct.

118 posted on 09/22/2006 10:00:49 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
But on this issue, he walks behind Vincente Fox.

And you are behind Vicente watching him swaggering" to make that obvesation, correct.

119 posted on 09/22/2006 10:00:50 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2006/04/02/2003300532
1.3 billion Chinese and the blonde sharp-shooter are all wrong?


120 posted on 09/22/2006 10:02:01 AM PDT by tumblindice (close the damn border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson