President Bush should not just threaten this with some countries - he should execute on it.
Let fear stalk anyone who dares raise their hand to the West.
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
09/22/2006 12:12:00 AM PDT by
MadIvan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; ...
2 posted on
09/22/2006 12:12:57 AM PDT by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
Interesting, Armitage is sure getting a whole lot of press these days.
To: MadIvan
President Musharraf said. I think it was a very rude remark. Oh, did it offend your Muslim sensibilities Mr. Musharraf?
To: MadIvan
5 posted on
09/22/2006 12:16:24 AM PDT by
MinorityRepublican
(Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
To: Howlin; onyx; Mo1
Dickie Armitage supposedly threatened the President of Pakistan, after 9/11; so says the President of Pakistan.
6 posted on
09/22/2006 12:17:30 AM PDT by
nopardons
To: MadIvan
Good to see you posting again! Just read this in the Times. It reminded me of a comment made by a sensible woman in Afghanistan the other day. She said it made no sense to bomb Afghanistan and not bomb Pakistan. She wanted liberation and knew that Pakistan funds. fuels, trains and protects the Taliban and other Islamist groups.
Years ago the art of war included cutting off the supply train.
8 posted on
09/22/2006 12:18:25 AM PDT by
vimto
(Blighty Awaken!)
To: MadIvan
MARK!,MARK!,MARK!...RELEASE! BOMBS AWAY!!!
To: MadIvan
Armitage is a loose cannon around members of the press, and presidents. I am glad he is gone. He caused a lot of damage for this administration.
10 posted on
09/22/2006 12:21:16 AM PDT by
rawhide
To: MadIvan
Wow! Great post! I love some of these quotes.
To: MadIvan
By my observation no bombing was necessary to put them back into the Stone Age.
13 posted on
09/22/2006 12:24:27 AM PDT by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: All
We should've taken out Iran's Nuke-facilities
while their puppet was speaking at the UN.
Imagine that.
God Bless America,
Maxmax.
15 posted on
09/22/2006 12:29:24 AM PDT by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
To: MadIvan
President Musharraf was clearly angered by Mr Bushs declaration that the US would act independently of his authority inside Pakistan.
I wonder if he feels the same away about bin Laden acting indepedently of his authority inside Pakistan.
16 posted on
09/22/2006 12:30:19 AM PDT by
dr_who_2
To: MadIvan
There is something to this story. Shortly before the Afghan campaign, Mushariff went public to the Pakistani, condemning the attacks on the US and disavowing the Taliban. This was broadcast here. While he didn't say who the messenger was, it was clear that Bush had read him the riot act. One statement he made stood out. (paraphrase) "Our very existence depends on our cooperation".
Beats me why he names Armitage as the messenger. The US already had a resident ambassador.
20 posted on
09/22/2006 12:41:30 AM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
To: All
"# February 2002. On a visit to the White House Musharraf says: We reject terrorism . . . we will continue to fulfill our responsibilities
Approximately a month after Rockefeller went to warn the neighborhood about mean President Bush and the same month that Joe Wilson went on his tea sipping venture to tag 'yellowcake'.
To: MadIvan
One of my childhood Heros said that,,What-A-Guy,,From what
I had heard,,He was 12ft. Tall ! I saw Him on the Flight-Line at BAFB in 1955 or so,,All Farts-N-Darts and See-gar,
Looked just like anybodys ol' fat PaPaw,,,
HEY,PERV,,,His Bombers Are Rite Down The Road !
Wanna Be LAOS ?
ARC-Light,ARC-Brite !
25 posted on
09/22/2006 12:58:14 AM PDT by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: MadIvan
And? I mean, are we supposed to say that was evil? I am personally loving this! Fred Flintstone here they come as far as I am concerned. Of course I just finished watching UNITED 93 for the first time tonight and I am so angry all over again!
To: MadIvan
In hind sight, it would of been wise if we had went ahead and occupied the border and locked it down. Even if it put President Musharraf in a bad spot. Its obvious he doesn't trust his Army and Intelligence Agencies;and so far what military action the Pakis have taken on has been somewhat inept and amateurish. But I don't blame Musharraf, he did the coup because of what his country had become and inherited a country that parts of it thought themselves pretty much self ruled instead of being beholden to Islamabad.
27 posted on
09/22/2006 1:02:20 AM PDT by
neb52
To: MadIvan; Saberwielder
The recent deal between Pakistan and the Deobandis in Waziristan has caused a lot of pressure on Musharraf from the civilized word, now he is trying to get more accolade from the Deobandis by blaming Armitage for his earlier decisions. ("I had no alternative.") The question is; why is Musharraf doing this now?
We have to give him another suggestion he can't refuse...
29 posted on
09/22/2006 1:05:47 AM PDT by
AdmSmith
To: MadIvan
Every interview with musharraf i have read, i have noted he has made all kinds of apparently candid comments, in some cases quite open about problems he has had or things he has done or not done. this guy is next to death's door (not from the US so much as islamic elements in his own country) and apparently has done quite a bit despite multiple attempts to kill him.
i have no doubt the stone age language might well have been used. pakistan would not be allowed to be neutral in september 2001.
To: MadIvan
has this appeared on the BBC yet? Would have thought they would be onto it like a shot.
36 posted on
09/22/2006 1:44:59 AM PDT by
Mac1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson