To: brazzaville
What part of the terminal being
14 miles offshore is troublesome? The NIMBY mentality will continue to drive our energy problems.
But hey, why should you (and the Hollyweird types) sacrifice a little, right?
10 posted on
09/16/2006 9:37:41 AM PDT by
JRios1968
(Tagline wanted...inquire within)
To: JRios1968
What part of the terminal being 14 miles offshore is troublesome? The NIMBY mentality will continue to drive our energy problems.
I have no problem with the NIMBYs but they should be barred from the use of any services they oppose and they should have to pay the owner of the property for the loss of use of his property.
To: JRios1968; Danae
Good morning.
"What part of the terminal being 14 miles offshore is troublesome?"
You and Danae should learn to read before you start mouthing off.
The problem isn't the terminal, but the traffic it will create in an area that is already congested.
I think they should build the terminal somewhere along the Columbia, or in the waters off northern Washington state.
I don't live in Southern California anymore and I'm 33 miles from the ocean. Build the damned terminal where you choose. Oh, and may you have fair winds and following seas.
Michael Frazier
17 posted on
09/16/2006 10:08:37 AM PDT by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson