Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brazzaville
What part of the terminal being 14 miles offshore is troublesome? The NIMBY mentality will continue to drive our energy problems.

But hey, why should you (and the Hollyweird types) sacrifice a little, right?

10 posted on 09/16/2006 9:37:41 AM PDT by JRios1968 (Tagline wanted...inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: JRios1968

What part of the terminal being 14 miles offshore is troublesome? The NIMBY mentality will continue to drive our energy problems.

I have no problem with the NIMBYs but they should be barred from the use of any services they oppose and they should have to pay the owner of the property for the loss of use of his property.


15 posted on 09/16/2006 9:59:31 AM PDT by freedomfiter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: JRios1968; Danae
Good morning.
"What part of the terminal being 14 miles offshore is troublesome?"

You and Danae should learn to read before you start mouthing off.

The problem isn't the terminal, but the traffic it will create in an area that is already congested.

I think they should build the terminal somewhere along the Columbia, or in the waters off northern Washington state.

I don't live in Southern California anymore and I'm 33 miles from the ocean. Build the damned terminal where you choose. Oh, and may you have fair winds and following seas.

Michael Frazier
17 posted on 09/16/2006 10:08:37 AM PDT by brazzaville (no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson