Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic School Sex Education...In The 4th Grade?!!!
Personal experience ^ | 9-13-06 | A concerned parent

Posted on 09/13/2006 3:39:30 PM PDT by icwhatudo

My daughter just started the 4th grade in a Catholic school in Maryland. I have been informed that she will be learning about "sperm", "eggs" etc but not full sex ed until later. (To me that sounds like someone just being a little bit pregnant).

I program my cable with passwords to avoid adult material being available to my child. I use online filters to protect my child while online. I pay a ton of money to send my child to Catholic school hoping to avoid the problems of government school that forces sex ed on kids at an earlier and earlier age. I'm really upset.

Its not that I want my child to be kept in the dark, I just think its more appropriate late in the 5th grade or early in the 6th. My God, why does a child who puts her tooth under her pillow for the tooth fairy need to know what sperm is?

Am I off base? Am I a religious whacko? Isn't there a time for a child to simply be a child?

If anyone has experience in this issue, or can share their thoughts as a fellow parent please do. I've thought about requesting to "Op-out" but I'm not sure thats an option and I worry about her being teased as everyone else becomes "in the know".

Again, I know they can't stay a child forever, but 3 months after leaving 3rd grade to learn about sperm?????

Your thoughts/suggestions appreciated.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: keywordtrolls; prudealert; sexeducation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: icwhatudo

I taught 5th Grade in a Catholic school in Chicago. We taugth "sex ed" as part of the religion class, at the end of the year. It was basic biology and why you don't have sex until you're married. I thought it was really well presented. I also sent home copies of the text and invitations to the parents to attend the class, no one responded. The girls (the other 5th grade teacher took the boys) didn't want to learn about sex at all, they kept saying they were too young! They were concerned about getting their period though..I do agree this early in 4th grade is young and personally I would either be in class the day it's taught or pull my child if you're not comfortable.


21 posted on 09/13/2006 4:02:43 PM PDT by pesto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Learned it in 4th grade in 1989-1990.

Didn't bother me a bit.


22 posted on 09/13/2006 4:03:11 PM PDT by MikefromOhio ("...America has confronted evil before, and we have defeated it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
When this happened at our Catholic school, I went before the board and reminded them that a definition of sexual harassment was unwanted discussion of sexual topics. For some children, the premature discussion of sexual topics done in a way to desensitize them and remove their innocence can be traumatic.
You will get their attention when you then mention the lawsuits which could result from such harassment. Good Luck.
23 posted on 09/13/2006 4:03:27 PM PDT by Klondike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I teach religion to fourth grade in a Catholic School. I don't know if your school uses the same curriculum as we do, but we use Benziger Family Life for this portion of our religion curriculum. It does talk about sperm and eggs but it doesn't mention reproduction or sex at all. It is a very small section in the curriculum (2 or 3 lessons at the most) and it is clearly designed to promote a pro-life point of view, without actually discussing conception.

We allow parents to review the material presented and to opt their children out of this portion if they would prefer their child not be exposed to the material. Keep in mind that many kids in fourth grade already know all about the birds and the bees.

Our focus in presenting the lesson is to introduce the idea that a baby begins in the mother's belly as a microscopic group of cells. Even when we can't see it, or feel it moving around, it is a baby boy or girl, specially designed by God. We show some ultrasound pictures of how babies grow, and what we looked like while we were still in Mom's tummy. The kids are much more interested in babies than the egg and sperm, which are meaningless terms to them at this age. I never thought it was inappropriate at all, and I have never had a student make the jump into sex or conception.

It may not be the same where you are, but thought it might help.


24 posted on 09/13/2006 4:08:10 PM PDT by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Klondike

Our son just completed 4th grade at the Catholic school in LAurel, MD. The closest thing they got to sex was basic cell division--not so much as one word about birds and bees. Same thing for 5th grade. They don't go into any detail about that until 6th and 7th gradesAnd by then, they will have learned a great deal of it anyway.


25 posted on 09/13/2006 4:08:25 PM PDT by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
Yeah, as long as we're talking the science of it all, that's totally different than dealing with the psychological/sociological/physiological aspects of human reproduction and the relationships that go therewith.

Seems to me 4th grade is about the time you're just going to get to this stuff in science. "Look at these plants. This is how one plant makes more plants [insert stem/pestle/pollen discussion]." The obvious next question is...
26 posted on 09/13/2006 4:12:48 PM PDT by Grn_Lantern (Let's go to work....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tiki

"From what I've seen most Catholic schools nowadays are "in name only.' They are taught by non-Catholic teachers, the curriculum is chosen by non_Catholic administrators and boards."

Do you have any information other than your personal observations to support this statement? I am asking because I have worked in Catholic Schools for years and almost all the teachers and administrators are Catholic, and the schools are all run by the Archdiocese superintendent.


27 posted on 09/13/2006 4:14:40 PM PDT by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

It all depends on what EXACTLY is being taught. However, the way you describe I would have to say that you are overreacting. What your kids are being taught is science, or more specifically biology, by learning how human life begins. Don't be so defensive, and don't look for problems where there aren't any.

In fact, you can try looking at it another way if it will make you feel better about it. When your kids learn at this young age about how sperm and eggs create people, it can very well make it that much harder for some baby killing nutjob to convince them that abortion is nothing more than a 'harmless medical procedure'. Because your kids will have learned early in life, that life begins at conception.


28 posted on 09/13/2006 4:26:08 PM PDT by frankiep (I respect Islamofacists more than the American left - at least they ADMIT that they hate the US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I would say I was probably 4th grade was when I had sex ed in Catholic school. That's probably around 1981 or maybe 5th grade, 1982.

My parents had already discussed it with me before that. Even back then schools knew if they waited too much longer the kid would start puberty and it might be too late.


29 posted on 09/13/2006 4:28:24 PM PDT by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Home School and tell 'em why!


30 posted on 09/13/2006 4:47:54 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Thanks everyone for your responses-its gives me a lot to think about. I love this place!


31 posted on 09/13/2006 4:53:03 PM PDT by icwhatudo (The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
I bet I am going to be one of the only freepers who tells you to take this calmly.

Is fourth grade too young to get the basics about sex ed, especially the strict biology of puberty? NO. I was one of those unlucky Catholic lasses who not only didn't learn it in school, but my mom never informed me. When I got my first period, I thought I was dying and freaked right the hell out.

Get a first hand look at the entire sex ed curriculum that your daughter will be exposed to. I'll bet you lunch you'll be relieved at how tame it is. In fourth grade, it's not about intercourse--it's about changes every child's body goes through, learning the names and functions of all the different parts "down yonder," and hygiene.

32 posted on 09/13/2006 5:01:36 PM PDT by grellis (I don't know, let me ask my I Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

With all due respect to your efforts to place your child in a good private (religious/Catholic) school, I think you need to do some serious and immediate research on an alternative private religious school. Here are my reasons for this position:

As a former Catholic (yes, I am now a Protestant) my observation is that the Catholic church here in the U.S. has gone way, way too far in the direction of secularism. How many nuns do you have running the school in which you have placed your child? Probably few, if any. Hence, the 'lay' staff is probably made up of teachers who have opted out of the public school system but do not have a particularly religious 'bent'. I would urge you to visit other private religious schools. You could find that they will not be detrimental to your desire to raise your child as a Catholic (assuming that is one goal you have) but may not be involved in such nonsense as teaching 'sperm' to a small child.


33 posted on 09/13/2006 5:16:02 PM PDT by hardworking (Please elect Comrade Clinton so that I can go on the dole too. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ga medic

"From what I've seen" ...pretty much tells the story to me.


34 posted on 09/13/2006 5:30:22 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

There's not enough in your statement to really make a value judgment regarding the cirriculumn....

If they are teaching the basics of biology then you will doing your child disservice by keeping them out. Especially if the curriculum in non-sexual in nature but simply covering the basic biology points.

All three of my children went through Catholic School from K-12 and if we found the material taught possibly objectionable, we scheduled a time to come in and review with context.

Each time, any concerns or fears were simply set aside when the material was reviewed.

Children in the 4th grade ask many questions.....the answers should be factual but age appropriate. 4th graders are curious where babies come from....they do not however need an in depth discussion of Human Sexuality.

A simple sperm combines with an egg in mommy's tummy that grows into a baby is sufficient. The focus on the biology from that point is pre-natal infant development.

Conclusion, review the material with the school and chances are you will allow your child to participate.

A Catholic School, regardless of Diocese, is not going to teach 4th graders a full course in Human Sexuality. I think your fears are overblown.


35 posted on 09/13/2006 5:34:25 PM PDT by nevergore (“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grn_Lantern

Yup, that's exactly what we just covered in science in our 4th grade class.
susie


36 posted on 09/13/2006 5:59:03 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

My husband is a farm-boy. He doesn't remember a time when he didn't know about sex.

I am a city girl. My mom gave me a couple of pamphlets when I was in 6th grade and health class in grade 7 taught me an awful lot.

We chose to answer our kids questions honestly, but age appropriately. When asked by a little one how a baby gets in a mommy's tummy, my husband says a daddy gives something special to a mommy and sometimes God will turn it into a baby. As the kids age, we add more specifics.

The kids are 10, 9, and 7 now. The 10 and 9 year old know how sex works including proper names for body parts and the like. They also know it is a gift of God for married people. The 7 year old is still just not interested and is good with the explanation in the above paragraph.

Is Grade 4 a good time to explain? Yes. If you have set some groundwork before hand, it will not be a shock to your child. The first time a child hears the word sperm shouldn't be in school, it should be at home.


37 posted on 09/13/2006 8:58:48 PM PDT by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

My son will be having "Family Life" this year in GA, in 7th grade.

I think 6th or 7th is appropriate, but I am checking out the curriculum. I will not allow him to attend if it does not align with our moral code.


38 posted on 09/13/2006 9:01:36 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Nearly 1% of illegals are in prison for felonies. Less than 1/10 of 1% of the legal population is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I learned about sex in a very matter-of-factly manner in a sex ed course in 5th grade in a Catholic school in 1993. Didn't traumatize me - I had looked up bits and pieces in encyclopedias and such before as I had been earlier somewhat curious (and my parents were definitely of the "not wanting to talk about sex" type). The only part I didn't like was when we "had" to ask the church/school youth minister some sort of sexually-related question. I was 10 - my virginity was still going to be sealed for a looooong time - what did I honestly have to ask?

Ironically, he later transferred to my high school and was my 12th grade "christian relations" course instructor, where he felt the need to elucidate his and his wife's entire sexual history and reproductive issues in great detail. Way TMI but I did learn an awful lot about natural family planning. And there was the whole STD slideshow in 8th and 10th grades. Now that's fun.

In sum, fourth grade is probably fine. It's best to give kids the facts as early as possible IMO to fight the eternal mistruth and falsehoods of the playground.


39 posted on 09/13/2006 9:13:49 PM PDT by mjwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
You probably did not grow up in a farming community.

I can safely say that of the hundreds of people I know who learned about sperm and eggs as a child, often much younger than the 4th grade, not one was damaged by it.

My second grader helps a family friend gather the eggs from the coop on the weekends. He knows about the role of roosters too.

Sex ed? My kid could teach the first chapter. Yet he still puts a tooth under the pillow and leaves cookies for Santa.

Unless the nuns are whipping out the cucumbers and condoms, I doubt you have much to worry about.
40 posted on 09/13/2006 9:35:49 PM PDT by McChordwatcher (Mostly lurking these days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson