Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123
The United States doesn't seem to have an embassy in North Korea.

The thing with Syria, the United States is almost as much against them as Iran. Since there isn't an embassy in Iran (because of the hostages taken before Reagan can to power?), it would be somewhat understandable if the United States wouldn't have one in Syria.

As for your point of keeping up dialogue, that is of course very logical.

181 posted on 09/12/2006 1:25:43 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: Jedi Master Pikachu

"The thing with Syria, the United States is almost as much against them as Iran. Since there isn't an embassy in Iran (because of the hostages taken before Reagan can to power?), it would be somewhat understandable if the United States wouldn't have one in Syria"

i am not sure the US has *voluntarily* closed an embassy in my lifetime.(possible exception being the successfully bombed african embassies). you gain nothing but some public posturing by doing so, and give up diplomatic access, contacts, etc.


203 posted on 09/12/2006 1:32:35 AM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
The United States doesn't seem to have an embassy in North Korea.

I believe we are are still officially at war with North Korea. We are only in a cease fire status under the terms of the armistice of 1953.

216 posted on 09/12/2006 1:39:19 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson