[EBH]

Can ABC or Disney sue for having been threatened by the DNC bunch?

[hoosiermama]

I think only if the DNC group actually "commits" an act against them.....Then the threat can be used as prof it was intentional not just a coincidence.

[prairiebreeze]

Well, I suppose they could. Anybody can file suit for anything anymore, but they won't.

[Pravious]

I hate the whining RATS. No one's seen this thing yet (well, except Rush and a couple of other pundits) yet they're more than willing to institute Gestapo tactics in order to stop the story from being told ("lies, lies, ALL LIES!" they rant, stamping their feet and holding their collective breaths -- unfortunately, not long enough...).

But, you know, what also frosts me is today's TV Guide poll, which must have been written by a Rat or Ratette. This presents the question of whether it's wrong to present a "fictionalized" story of the events leading up to 9/11 -

The choice is (paraphrased)

1. It's wrong because the show is a politically biased, lying piece of crap (no doubt because it says something less than flattering about the Hallowed Clinton administration).

2. It's okay because the filmmakers have the right to "shape the story" (i.e., lie) to pull in viewers.

There is a third choice, which says: "I'll wait and see, first..." but #1 is far ahead in the poll (and no wonder, when the thing is worded that way!).

[interrogatorgirl]

and another question, if they can prove the dems hacked the sites where the videos were can they be prosecuted? Maybe Algore could back us up on that being such a big proponent of the internet and freedom of information right? (sarc)