[dayglored]

> Thank God for the ACLU, protecting American children from the Bible. And which side do you think they would be on if this was Porn?

Oh for Pete's sake. The ACLU might defend the rights of adults to view porn, but even they know better than to claim kids have a right to it.

As we attack the ACLU, let's at least keep our minds clear. It improves our chances of winning.

[fortheDeclaration]

Thank God for the ACLU, protecting American children from the Bible. And which side do you think they would be on if this was Porn? Oh for Pete's sake. The ACLU might defend the rights of adults to view porn, but even they know better than to claim kids have a right to it. As we attack the ACLU, let's at least keep our minds clear. It improves our chances of winning.

Is that right?

Check out the ACLU's stance on children viewing Porn on computers in the Public libraries.

Censorship in a Box: Why Blocking Software is Wrong for Public Libraries (9/16/2002)

http://www.aclu.org/privacy/speech/14915pub20020916.html

[fortheDeclaration]

Another case involving government restrictions of speech, which the court has not yet decided, tests the constitutionality of a separate law governing access by adults and children to sexually explicit material on the Internet. The ACLU challenged the law on behalf of writers of sexual advice columns; Planetout.com; OB/GYN.net; Artnet.com; and websites for bookstores, art galleries, and the Philadelphia Gay News. A decision in that case, ACLU v. Ashcroft, No. 00-1293, is expected by the end of June.

http://www.aclu.org/scotus/2001/14792prs20020416.html

Ofcourse, when it has to do with Porn, it is a 'free speech' issue.

When it has to do with the Bible it is a separation of church and state issue.

For the ACLU, the Bible is more threatening to children then Porn is, since it represents a threat to their own secular world view.

Never underestimate the wickedness of your enemy.

[Always Right]

Oh for Pete's sake. The ACLU might defend the rights of adults to view porn, but even they know better than to claim kids have a right to it.

Actually, the ACLU is a strong defender of having obscene material available to children. The ACLU opposes any restrictions on internet access for children. The American Library Association use to even provide a recomended link children to a sex advise columnist who discussed things like safe rimming and even beastiality. These people are sick.