Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair 'to hand over power in May'
BBC ^ | 7 September 2006

Posted on 09/07/2006 4:22:48 AM PDT by Jack2006

Tony Blair will announce later he will be stepping down as prime minister within the next 12 months, Downing Street has confirmed.

He will make a statement on his future between 1400 BST and 1500 BST.

He is not expected to give a precise date but Commons leader Jack Straw has indicated the prime minister plans to stand down in May.

It follows 48 hours of bitter feuding and a string of resignations over Mr Blair's refusal to name an exit date.

Mr Blair's official spokesman said: "The prime minister is very well aware of what the public must be thinking and will reflect that."

He said Mr Blair would not be giving a running commentary" on dates but was "very comfortable with what [environment secretary] David Miliband set out on Tuesday and will also reflect that".

Downing Street has rejected suggestions a deal had been struck to hand over power on 4 May, three days after Mr Blair notches up 10 years in power and the day after local elections.

But Mr Straw said earlier voters would expect Mr Blair to stay "to the halfway point of a normal four-year parliament", which would be May - thought to be a signal to supporters of Chancellor Gordon Brown calling for an earlier exit.

The BBC's political editor Nick Robinson said Mr Blair is thought likely put a precise date on his departure "some time in the New Year".

According to this timetable, Mr Blair would then resign as Labour leader in early May, with a new prime minister in place by early June.

But our correspondent stressed this was a provisional timetable and could change.

Mr Blair has been under pressure to quit earlier than May in order to get a new leader in place before elections in England, Scotland and Wales, which are expected to be disastrous for Labour.

'Acrimonious meeting'

Mr Brown - the man most likely to succeed Mr Blair - is also thought to be unhappy at the prospect of taking over at the end of a Parliamentary session.

The two men were reported to have to have had an "acrimonious meeting" over the issue on Wednesday morning.

It was followed by a day of open warfare between supporters of the chancellor and Mr Blair over when the prime minister should quit.

But with Mr Brown carrying out engagements in Scotland on Thursday, Cabinet ministers moved to calm speculation about Mr Blair's future.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Straw said he believed the prime minister had provided "sufficient certainty for the party to settle down, to draw back from this abyss" at the end of an "unsatisfactory" few days.

'Certainty'

Mr Blair had "made it clear - or it has been made clear on his behalf - this forthcoming conference, in three weeks' time, will be his last annual conference", he said.

"There has to be another leader in place by next year's annual conference.

"Our procedures take some time, because we're a democratic party," he said.

"There has to be some certainty about who the leader is before the summer break next summer, not afterwards, and people can then work backwards from there.

"I think that is satisfactory. I think it's what the party accepts."

Junior defence minister Tom Watson and seven government aides - or Parliamentary Private Secretaries - quit on Wednesday after urging Mr Blair to stand down.

Mr Blair branded Mr Watson, the most senior person to leave, "disloyal, discourteous and wrong" for signing the letter.

Allies of the chancellor denied the eight resignations were part of a plot by the Brown camp.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: blair; tonyblair
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2006 4:22:49 AM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

Palestinians dancing in the streets ... of London!


2 posted on 09/07/2006 4:30:32 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup ("Is it real? Or is it Reuters?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

"Palestinians dancing in the streets ... of London!"

Eh?


3 posted on 09/07/2006 4:31:56 AM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

He means that once Blair goes, our greatest ally in the UK on the War on Terror will be gone and replaced with a jellyfish the Islamofascists will rejoice over.


4 posted on 09/07/2006 4:36:21 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

IOW Blair will step down after Iran gets bombed so that he can support us unlike his successor


5 posted on 09/07/2006 4:39:06 AM PDT by dennisw (Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Total nonsense.

If anything the backbench Labour MP's criticise Brown for always being in America and being too pro-American.

If you knew about British politics you would know that if Gordon Brown rebelled against the War in Iraq there would have been no British involvement.

He probably has more power over policy in the UK, than Cheney has in America and that's saying something.


6 posted on 09/07/2006 4:39:12 AM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

Apres Blair le deluge


7 posted on 09/07/2006 4:40:10 AM PDT by dennisw (Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

(Queen's) English translation: the Iraqi Government has until May 2007 to get its act together. After that, "things will happen automatically".


8 posted on 09/07/2006 4:53:36 AM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie

Whether it is Blair, Brown, Reid or Cameron - it doesn't matter.

Britain under Blair is already pulling out of Iraq. If the Iraqis want to kill each other then tough.


9 posted on 09/07/2006 4:58:40 AM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

In addition - You give to much credence to America and Iraq in British politics.

Quite frankly they are afterthoughts.

The decision to go will be based around the Scottish Parliament and Welsh assembly elections.


10 posted on 09/07/2006 5:00:09 AM PDT by Jack2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

I will miss Mr. Blair. A true and faithful ally in the War on Terror.


11 posted on 09/07/2006 5:54:32 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack2006

About the only thing Tony Blair has been good for is his stance on the War. Domestically and in dealing with Europe he has been a disaster.

I am enjoying watching Labour tear itself apart over him. Gordon Brown is going to be the Paul Martin of the UK, finally taking over as PM only to see his party go down in defeat.

David Cameron was not my first choice to lead the Tories, but with this mess, he will be Prime Minister after the next election. Good Riddance to "Cool Britannia" and "New" Labour...


12 posted on 09/07/2006 6:17:11 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (The Solution to the GOP's Problems Isn't More Democrats!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps
"About the only thing Tony Blair has been good for is his stance on the War. Domestically and in dealing with Europe he has been a disaster."

I believe there is a parallel there with George Bush. His strongest suit is also the WOT. Domestically he is not a socialist, as is Tony Blair, but his brand of conservatism is certainly big government, which is parallel.

My feeling though is that both men follow their convictions, which makes them intrinsically honest.

13 posted on 09/07/2006 6:30:50 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

If Gordon Brown was anti-US, he would have said so by now. The fact he’s said exactly nothing on foreign policy I’m 99% sure means that what he would say would annoy the Labour rank and file. Which is a good thing as far as most here are concerned.


14 posted on 09/07/2006 9:50:35 AM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

When you say socialist it’s all relative. Tony Blair, leader of the ‘left wing’ party in the UK, is far more free market-inclined than Jacques Chirac, leader of the ‘right wing’ party in France. I’ve never voted Labour and I disagree with many of his policies but I look at Blair and think it could have been worse.

True socialism is dead in the UK, at least for now. It’s now all about arguing over the shade of the mixed economy.


15 posted on 09/07/2006 9:51:32 AM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FostersExport
I will accept that. Glad to hear that the UK is still considerably to the right of France. I tend to like Blair in any case, simply for his remark about 9/11 being an attack on Western Civilization. Clear thinking guy when he wants to be.

My favored beer the one time I was in Australia.

16 posted on 09/07/2006 10:05:18 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps
David Cameron was not my first choice to lead the Tories, but with this mess, he will be Prime Minister after the next election.

Wasn't my first choice, either, but I've been trying to give him the benefit of the doubt.

I don't understand Blair's popularity in the USA. He's been reasonably good on the GWOT--but it's a no brainer, isn't it? The Tories would have done better, if we had been in power.

I think some Americans don't realise that Blair is a Socialist. He's Left rather than Hard Left, and that's bad enough. It's his own Hard-Left that have turned on him now; good news, it paves the way for the Conservatives at the next general election.

All we have to do is keep Mr. Cameron true blue!

17 posted on 09/07/2006 1:15:28 PM PDT by ToryHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
He means that once Blair goes, our greatest ally in the UK on the War on Terror will be gone and replaced with a jellyfish the Islamofascists will rejoice over.

I presume the 'jellyfish' you mean is Gordon Brown.

Well, even if Blair does manage to stage a 'coronation,' I'm reasonably optimistic the Socialists will be out of office come next election. As a lame-duck leader of a rump Government, I'm not too worried about how much damage Mr. Brown can inflict before he is shown the door!

18 posted on 09/07/2006 1:18:35 PM PDT by ToryHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
My feeling though is that both men [President Bush and Prime Minister Blair] follow their convictions, which makes them intrinsically honest.

I agree President Bush is a man of integrity, honesty and conviction, but sorry, I don't apply any of that to Mr. Blair.

19 posted on 09/07/2006 1:21:44 PM PDT by ToryHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: snugs

fyi


20 posted on 09/07/2006 1:31:24 PM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson