Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peak oil theorists don't know Jack ( It Could Increase U.S. Reserves by 50% )
Globe and Mail ^ | 5 September 2006 | PATRICK BRETHOUR

Posted on 09/05/2006 10:03:24 PM PDT by demlosers

The elephants aren't extinct yet.

Chevron Corp. and its partners say they have tapped into an area that may contain as much as 15 billion barrels of oil in the ultradeep waters of the Gulf of Mexico — the kind of massive reservoir of crude that the industry dubs an elephant discovery.

The days of such discoveries were supposedly gone, with oil supplies peaking as the world simply ran out of big oil-producing fields, according to pessimistic forecasters. Instead, high technology and sky-high oil prices have combined to transform dud prospects into billions of barrels of crude.

“The industry is still very capable of coming up with new ways of producing oil,” says Michael Lynch, a prominent opponent of the notion of peak oil — that global supplies of crude are set for a marked decline.

The exact size of the reserves at the Chevron well, called Jack, aren't yet known. But the company said the wider area, known as the Lower Tertiary, could contain between three billion and 15 billion barrels of recoverable oil. At the upper end of the range, that would rival the Prudhoe Bay deposits in Alaska.

And it could increase U.S. domestic reserves by 50 per cent. Only part of that overall total, however, could be attributed to the Jack prospect, which some analysts said Tuesday is likely to amount to 500 million barrels.

Whatever the ultimate size of Jack, its true importance lies in when it was discovered — earlier this decade, rather than in the 1960s or 1970s, said Mr. Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research Inc. It is proof positive that higher commodity prices and improvements in exploration technology can result in major new discoveries, he said.

That is the case at Chevron's Jack well in the Gulf of Mexico, nearly 300 kilometres from the U.S. coast. Massive caps and peaks of prehistoric salt had defeated earlier exploration efforts, chewing up the sound waves that the industry uses to create seismic pictures of reservoirs.

“It soaks it up, distorts it,” said Stephen Hadden, senior vice-president of exploration and production at Devon Energy Corp., which has a 25-per-cent stake in Jack and other prospects in the Lower Tertiary region.

Devon, with proved reserves of 2.1 billion barrels of oil and gas, said it could more than double its reserves from its holdings in the area. Devon said its Lower Tertiary prospects could contain the equivalent of six billion barrels of oil, using the expansive measure of unrisked resource potential. Despite the caveat, Devon shares jumped 12 per cent, with analysts saying the firm is an alluring takeover target.

“The larger companies are running out of room to grow and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico is right down their alley,” said Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Fadel Gheit. “They really have no options left — Russia is for all practical purposes closing its doors, the Middle East is radioactive, Venezuela is kicking us out, and the Canadian oil sands, I think, are played out.”

Devon's Mr. Hadden said several new technologies and techniques were brought to bear on Jack, combining to allow the partners to fashion a picture of the reservoirs underneath the previously impenetrable salt caps. More powerful computers and refined algorithms were part of that success. “It's a technology that's really evolved over the last six or seven years,” he said.

Such technology reduces the risk of ultradeep exploration in the gulf, where future wells are likely to cost up to $120-million (U.S.), Mr. Hadden said, declining to say how much Jack cost.

Jim Lovasz, senior engineering analyst at Ross Smith Energy Group Ltd. in Calgary, said new simulation technology is also playing a part in opening up new frontiers to oil exploration.

New frontiers such as the Lower Tertiary will keep the global supply of oil growing, Mr. Lynch said — although it's not likely to silence the advocates of peak oil.

“This won't convince the bulk of them. For the rest of us, it does serve as a reminder that there are still a lot of things that can still be done.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anwr; energy; oil; oilreserves; peakoil; thomasgold; usoilreserves
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Dosa26
I'm still waiting for a good explanation for the seas of hydrocarbons (oil) flowing on Saturn's moon Titan.

So far... Cricket Cricket Cricket...

21 posted on 09/05/2006 10:35:14 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Prost1

I just bought an SUV.


22 posted on 09/05/2006 10:35:28 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

That's where dinosaurs came from.


23 posted on 09/05/2006 10:36:23 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dosa26

Coast to Coast or similar shows usually have the peak oil tinfoil guys on.


24 posted on 09/05/2006 10:39:30 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
The technology to start exploring to these depths has really started coming on line the past 10 years.

And you wonder why the China National Petroleum Corporation is probably quietly negotiating with Vietnam and the Philippines to drill for oil in the Spratly Islands. Some have estimated that the undersea oilfields around the Spratly Islands could yield as much as 300 billion barrels of crude oil, a massive find to say the least.

25 posted on 09/05/2006 10:39:59 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Hope everyone remembers that it took record oil prices to get this to happen.


26 posted on 09/05/2006 10:45:41 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

How did dinasaurs end up under water? GLOBAL WARMING MUST HAVE DONE IT!


27 posted on 09/05/2006 10:47:22 PM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

Agreed. Spending all sorts of money trying to find cheap oil doesn't make sense. Or - if you think that the next President will sign a piece of paper taking your prospect off the map.


28 posted on 09/05/2006 10:49:54 PM PDT by geopyg (If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rte66
Hope everyone remembers that it took record oil prices to get this to happen.

Yes, eventually the economic market will meet demands and stabilize.

29 posted on 09/05/2006 10:50:26 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

I don't think so. Do you really think this has only been in the works for two or three years? The article says the algorithms have been in preparation for several years.


30 posted on 09/05/2006 10:51:37 PM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
At the upper end of the range, that would rival the Prudhoe Bay deposits in Alaska.

I'm all for oil independence. I'm all for discovering lots of oil. I'm all for exploring for new oil reserves and getting that oil to market. But this Gulf of Mexico find alone isn't going to free us from the terrorists currently selling us oil. Prudhoe Bay is a terrific oil resource, but in the grand scheme of things, it never approached making us oil independent. So, I'm glad for any new oil discovery, but this isn't making me all that excited.

31 posted on 09/05/2006 10:52:29 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Yeah, I thought they just got the AFEs this week. /sarc


32 posted on 09/05/2006 11:06:39 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

You sure sound like it in #26.


33 posted on 09/05/2006 11:08:23 PM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Eating olive oil makes you live longer!


34 posted on 09/05/2006 11:13:14 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Whatever. I was saying that to those who were screaming about the perceived high price of gasoline and the perceived high price of oil, then cheering for the find in the Gulf, as if Chevron, Statoil and Devon just "found" this field to quiet the critics of the oil industry.

No company is going to put that kind of money upfront to test a well like that while "counting on" $70/bbl oil. A lot of people think it's just instantaneous and that oil companies have all the money in the world to go out exploring, but they don't. Others think they know where all the petroleum is and they just go drill and produce it, like magic.

Imagine what they might have found if oil were just $50/bbl and holding. If anything, something smaller, for sure.


35 posted on 09/05/2006 11:18:37 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: geopyg

Exactly.


36 posted on 09/05/2006 11:19:36 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Really interesting find especially considering it is apparently under 6k ft of ocean and then 25k ft of earth. Theory used to be at at such a depth the temperature and pressure would be so high that all the hydrocarbons would be very short and likely methane.

Questions: What is the viscosity of this find? Deepest producing well in California is about 17,500 ft, what is the current deepest US well and deepest in the world? How long have we had the technology to actually go 5+ miles underground economically? And, what's the current industry and scientific perspective (i.e., ignoring the anti-progress wackos) on how deep underground oil can be located?


37 posted on 09/05/2006 11:19:53 PM PDT by SERUM10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERUM10

I worked on a rig in Wyoming that went to 24k, and a rig in Oklahoma that went to 36k - summer jobs as a roughneck (early eighies).


38 posted on 09/05/2006 11:24:20 PM PDT by geopyg (If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: geopyg

Yeah, those were the ones I was thinking about, in the Anadarko Deep - but they are natural gas wells. There are more land-based natural gas wells drilled below 25,000 feet there than anywhere in the world.

Chevron has one in the TX Panhandle that I believe is the deepest producing well, but I'm not current.


39 posted on 09/05/2006 11:33:45 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Rte66
"Hope everyone remembers that it took record oil prices to get this to happen."

I remember that I have a truck, 2 cars, two outboard motors, a mowing machine and a generator and I ain't broke yet.

yitbos

40 posted on 09/06/2006 12:23:37 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds. " - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson