Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Won't Allow a Nuclear-Armed Iran
ocala ^ | Sep. 5, 2006 | BY BARRY SCHWEID

Posted on 09/05/2006 12:05:11 PM PDT by Flavius

BY BARRY SCHWEID AP Diplomatic Writer WASHINGTON

Enlarge | Purchase President Bush gestures during remarks on the global war on terror on Tuesday, Sept. 5, 2006 in Washington. Bush used terrorists' own words Tuesday to battle complacency among Americans about the threat of future attack, defending his national security record as the fall campaign season kicks into high gear. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) President Bush said Tuesday a nuclear-armed Iran would blackmail the free world and raise a mortal threat to the American people.

"I am not going to allow this to happen," Bush said in a speech on terrorism. "And no future American president can allow it, either."

With allies urging a go-slow approach on pressuring Iran to stop enriching uranium, Bush pledged to work closely with other governments to find a diplomatic solution to the standoff with Tehran over its nuclear programs.

But he also stressed, "the world's free nations will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon."

Iran has refused to stop enrichment as a precondition to negotiations on U.S. and European offers of concessions, including U.S. help with civilian nuclear programs.

"Their choice is increasingly isolating the great Iranian nation from the international community," Bush said.

"It is time for Iran's leader to make a different choice," he said.

While standing firm on seeking U.N. sanctions against Iran, the administration acknowledged Tuesday there would be weeks of intensive diplomacy to nail them down.

"There is going to be some work that's required in the Security Council," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said. "I would expect that that is going to be tough, intensive diplomacy over the course of the coming weeks."

But he said the U.N. Security Council had already made it clear in a resolution that if Iran failed to meet an Aug. 31 deadline to suspend uranium enrichment, the Council was prepared to vote for sanctions.

And so, he said, the United States intends to proceed "down that pathway."

Iran has renewed to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan an offer of negotiations about its nuclear programs, but has declined to suspend enrichment of uranium as a precondition.

Tehran insists that its nuclear activities are designed to produce civilian power and are within its rights.

Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns is due to hold talks in Berlin on Thursday with European, Russian and Chinese diplomats on strategy for applying sanctions.

To maximize chances for agreement, the Bush administration is inclined to seek graduated sanctions, beginning with such limited measures as restrictions on providing Iran with technology that could be used in military programs.

European governments as well as Russia and China have urged patience with Iran. The senior European diplomat, Javier Solana, is expected to meet Wednesday in Vienna with Ali Larijani, the chief Iranian nuclear negotiator.

McCormack said the administration would encourage governments "that might have some sway over Iran to engage them and to send a very clear message to them that they need to comply with the just demands of the international community."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; bush43; fifthanniversary; iran; irannukes; preemption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: tflabo

</html>http://www.audiosparx.com/sa/play/port_lofi.cfm/sound_iid.26570

Tomahawk chop music link.


41 posted on 09/05/2006 2:39:45 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
The UN will NEVER impose sanctions on Iran and Germany has already ruled out military force to curtail Iran's nuclear bomb program. More diplomacy is simply going to give Iran more time to make the bomb a fait accompli - and judging from Western reactions, they think they can get away with it.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

42 posted on 09/05/2006 2:43:27 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne
"I am not going to allow this to happen," Bush said in a speech on terrorism. "And no future American president can allow it, either."

He didn't say, I don't want them to have nukes or I wish that they would negotiate in good faith, he said, "I am NOT going to allow this to happen....."

Osama didn't believe him. The sadman didn't belive him. Khadafly believed him. Amadamadingdong will find out if GWB is a man of his word. I believe him.

43 posted on 09/05/2006 2:51:56 PM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dawn53; RightWhale
What about his dealings with that part of the world gives you the sense that it's a "read my lips" moment (as you put it?)"

"This part right here: "And no future American president can allow it, either."

44 posted on 09/05/2006 2:56:06 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson