Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Washington scandal that wasn't
National Post ^ | 2006-09-02 | David Frum

Posted on 09/02/2006 5:19:23 AM PDT by Clive

Has a Washington scandal ever ended with a more anti-climactic splat than the Valerie Plame/Joe Wilson affair?

This week it was at last fully and finally confirmed that it was former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage who had leaked the name of CIA agent Valerie Plame.

Put like that, the story sounds pretty bare. So let me put it another way. Imagine that Ken Starr's investigation had concluded that Monica Lewinsky had made the whole thing up -- and that it was established beyond all possible doubt that at the very moment Monica claimed she was experiencing ecstasy in the Oval Office with Bill Clinton, Clinton was in fact up in the White House family quarters helping Hillary sort old wedding photographs.

Imagine all that, and you only begin to imagine how utterly the biggest scandal of the Bush years has fizzled into nothing.

The scandal originated in George Bush's Jan. 28, 2003, State of the Union address:

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Six months later, on July 6, 2003, The New York Times published an op-ed by one Joseph Wilson that accused the president of twisting intelligence. Wilson explained that the CIA had sent him to Niger in 2002 to investigate Iraqi uranium buying -- and that he had reported back that it was all bunk. Suddenly all Washington was asking the same question: Who the hell was Joe Wilson?

Wilson, a former ambassador to Gabon now struggling to earn a living as an international business consultant, seemed a very unlikely person to investigate a secret nuclear transaction. The next week, syndicated columnist Robert Novak provided the answer: Wilson had been proposed for the assignment by his wife, Valerie Plame, "an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction."

The administration's critics immediately erupted in outrage. "Did senior Bush officials blow the cover of a U.S. intelligence officer working covertly in a field of vital importance to national security -- and break the law -- in order to strike at a Bush administration critic and intimidate others?" So demanded David Corn of The Nation magazine.

For his part, Ambassador Wilson vehemently denied that his wife had anything to do with his assignment.

The administration succumbed to media pressure and appointed a special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, to investigate the case. Critics gleefully settled in to wait for "Fitzmas" -- the happy day when the prosecutor would indict the so-called neocon cabal. Many speculated that the scandal must touch the Vice President, even the President. Wilson himself said he was looking forward to seeing Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs.

Over time, it became clear that almost every detail of Joe Wilson's original story was false. Wilson's appointment was engineered by his wife. The report he filed did not acquit the Iraqis. Wilson had not detected forged documents. Above all: An Iraqi trade mission had in fact sought uranium in Niger in 1998 -- the President had spoken accurately.

Nonetheless, the Plame scandal ricocheted throughout the government. The Bush administration's pro-democracy, pro-Israel foreign policies were ferociously opposed by most of the U.S. national-security bureaucracy, and especially the CIA. Inflamed by the Plame allegations, CIA officials acted almost as part of the Kerry campaign organization through campaign 2004. Since Kerry's defeat, CIA betrayals of administration secrets have helped clinch one Pulitzer Prize for The New York Times and another for the Washington Post.

Yet somehow Fitzmas never came.

And then last week, Newsweek excerpted a new book co-authored by the magazine's Michael Isikoff and arch-conspiracy theorist David Corn that reveals that the Plame leak sprang not from Rove or Cheney, but from Armitage -- and that Patrick Fitzgerald has known this truth for close to three years.

Armitage was never an administration hawk. Indeed, he and his close friend Colin Powell loathed the so-called neocon cabal as fervently as David Corn himself. Armitage identified Plame to Novak not to settle scores, but out of a weak-minded delight in gossip.

Armitage, a former Marine, often questioned the physical courage of civilians who disagreed with him. But after the scandal exploded, and even as his administration colleagues and the President to whom he owed loyalty were exposed to enormous legal jeopardy by his actions, he kept silent to protect himself.

It's a shameful story. But the shame does not fall quite where the media promoters of the story hoped it would. Which may explain why newspapers such as The New York Times and left-wing blogs which once relished every last twist and turn of the saga have suddenly gone as silent about it as Armitage himself.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cialeak; davidfrum; plamebroiled; plamegate; plameout; wilaonsonw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: FreedomPoster

"They share greatly in Armitage's shame"

Ditto me, ditto me mucho ...


21 posted on 09/02/2006 5:39:46 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Put like that, the story sounds pretty bare. So let me put it another way. Imagine that Ken Starr's investigation had concluded that Monica Lewinsky had made the whole thing up -- and that it was established beyond all possible doubt that at the very moment Monica claimed she was experiencing ecstasy in the Oval Office with Bill Clinton, Clinton was in fact up in the White House family quarters helping Hillary sort old wedding photographs.

What a wonderful way to illustrate the significance.

22 posted on 09/02/2006 5:40:02 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
It never was important. Even if everything the dems claimed were true, it was a big nothing.
23 posted on 09/02/2006 5:40:42 AM PDT by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

The Dems, the Left, and the MSM can not be allowed to just drop this issue.

This was white hot in 2003 and 2004. This was going to be the Watergate, the turn of the screw that was going to lead to the impeachment of President Bush.

Oh yeah, the Left was orgasmic over the prospects.

Now, the MSM wants to just make this go away, when they were complicit in the lies. When Joe Wilson was exposed as a liar by the Senate Intelligence Committee last year, he wasn't worried--he knew the MSM would just cover for him, which they did.

Fitzgerald needs to be fired, and brought up on misconduct charges. Libby needs to have all charges dropped. After all, perjury is no big deal--that's what the MSM drilled into us in 1998-1999, when their buddy Bill Clinton was in the hot seat.

No, they can not be allowed to go quietly into this good night.

Just as important, now that the Niger issue has been proven true, what were the inplications for the War on Terror. It tuns the whole world view of the MSM on its head. That can't be allowed to die either.


24 posted on 09/02/2006 5:41:11 AM PDT by exit82 (Sorry. You, along with Pluto, have just been voted out of the solar system(from FreeperLasVegasMac).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

It will be interesting when the Senate returns to "work".


25 posted on 09/02/2006 5:41:38 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Anselma

Yeah and Iam sure the major TV networks will lead their news with the truth


Still waiting


26 posted on 09/02/2006 5:41:48 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

"special prosecutor to investigate Patrick Fitzgerald "

Abismolutely!

At the very least, suspend his law lic until the investigation is over.


27 posted on 09/02/2006 5:42:34 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Anselma

If there isn't money channeled to suspicious quarters and friends and relatives on the payroll.....well that would be quite a surprise.


28 posted on 09/02/2006 5:44:25 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clive
The report he filed did not acquit the Iraqis. Wilson had not detected forged documents. Above all: An Iraqi trade mission had in fact sought uranium in Niger in 1998 -- the President had spoken accurately.

And this is the real story

Wilson should be prosecuted for this lie

But that will happen after Sandy Berger goes to jail for stealing secret documents

GOP is PATHETIC when it comes to fighting back
29 posted on 09/02/2006 5:45:46 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asp1

It will be sold in the science fiction department.


30 posted on 09/02/2006 5:50:04 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry
Hey tired did you hear that two FAA employees are in trouble for lying to the 911 commission.

They told the commission that they informed the military right after they found out about the hijacking. Seems they waited over an hour before telling them.

There goes all those conspiracies about the military letting the planes hit without going after them.

31 posted on 09/02/2006 5:50:35 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: asp1

'Sorry that I have offended you with my "lameness."'

I'm sorry, asp1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm all worked up, but do appreciate the sotof example. It's just that I hear that type of thing all the time on conservative Talk Radio, and it kinda "softens" the message. Seems to be a too-nice way of pointing out the dastards and their deeds.
And you know what happens to Nice Guys ...


32 posted on 09/02/2006 5:51:16 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Wilson, a former ambassador to Gabon now struggling to earn a living as an international business consultant

Unfortunately, Wilson is raking in some pretty big bucks on the college lecture circuit. Back in Michigan, my wife forwarded me the laudatory newspaper article announcing his presence; not one word about his documented lies. His lecture was attended by over 1,000 students.

33 posted on 09/02/2006 5:52:09 AM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

review


34 posted on 09/02/2006 5:52:47 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

Wow, I had not heard that.


35 posted on 09/02/2006 5:53:37 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

All of these revalations are a smokescreen to bail russert and others out. They know that being deposed and called to testify would deflate this whole affair and make them look like the snakes they are. Hence book, and this whole CF just runs out of gas.

They will not continue to cover a non story


36 posted on 09/02/2006 5:54:30 AM PDT by slapshot (""USAF- when you absolutely, positively need it delivered on target, on time, right away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry
Heard it on Fox about 15 minutes ago.

Iam looking for a article on it.

37 posted on 09/02/2006 5:54:35 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

"GOP is PATHETIC when it comes to fighting back"

Yah, for sure. Rummy's fighting back, in a nice way, now!!! But I'd prefer to see the New Media nail this one, and nail it loudly, rather than see the GOP itself turn into something resembling the Nasticrats.

Is the problem that the Old Media have been bought-and-paid-for by so many years of Nasticrat dominance???
And the New Media is still playing by Duchess of Queensbury Rules?


38 posted on 09/02/2006 5:57:56 AM PDT by Anselma (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Or as reported in the Lacadaimonia Daily Bugle:
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
~President George W. Bush~
State of the Union Address
January 28, 2003

"The New York Times published an op-ed that accused the president of twisting intelligence."

"...almost every detail of" (the) "story was false."

"the President had spoken accurately."

"It's a shameful story."


39 posted on 09/02/2006 5:58:56 AM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson