Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b
While Wikipedia should never be the last place one looks for information about a specific topic, I increasingly find that it is the best starting point for an exploration of a new subject.

Agree 100%.

5 posted on 08/31/2006 6:13:34 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
Agree 100%.

Me too. I might not look to them first for anything too controversial, but I find them extremely useful for basic information about a great many things.

If it's important, I look for confirmation elsewhere. But that's just common sense.

7 posted on 08/31/2006 6:17:59 AM PDT by prion (Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

I would never use it as an official source for work or school or anything that required a bit of credibility, but I do find it a useful source to start off with to get some basic info.

I then verify everything I want to use.


16 posted on 08/31/2006 7:06:13 AM PDT by elc (Feeling the babywearing love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy; steve-b
Agree 100%.

It depends on the subject. Some things which are less controversial than others are generally more accurate than say an article about Condi Rice would be.
21 posted on 08/31/2006 8:15:42 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - Go Bucks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson