Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
Big difference Dane, internal networks of highways not the same a continental superhighway that starts at foreign ports. To bad you have zero skills in military science. Folks that got upset at Chinese taking effective control of the Panama Canal will go (rightfully) ballistic over this lame brain idea, from a national security view.

The economic view is not much better, pipe lines good, 30 lane continental super highways bad.

I'm sure this idea will make the open border crowd very happy. Once finished any and all from parts WAY south will have a wide open road into the most of USA or Canada.

39 posted on 08/27/2006 8:58:27 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb
Big difference Dane, internal networks of highways not the same a continental superhighway that starts at foreign ports.

Uh jp, Eisenhower's Interstate system was a continental superhighway.

Just waiting for you to bring up the Phyllis Scafley/Buchanan/Bircher talking points that Eisenhower was an atheist any time now.

40 posted on 08/27/2006 9:07:27 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: jpsb
Once finished any and all from parts WAY south will have a wide open road into the most of USA or Canada

What are you talking about? Why will this road be more "open" than any other border-crossing road?

41 posted on 08/27/2006 9:12:15 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson