Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Navy Nuclear Sub Debuts in Atlantic
The Associated Press ^ | Aug 26, 2006 | TRAVIS REED

Posted on 08/26/2006 8:42:31 AM PDT by george76

The Navy debuted its newest nuclear-powered submarine Friday in an Atlantic Ocean swing off the Florida coast, the second in the latest fast-attack class that marks a broad departure from the Cold War-era deterrence boats.

The Texas, which will officially earn a "USS" designator in a commissioning ceremony in two weeks, weighs 7,800 tons, measures 377 feet long and can remain submerged on covert surveillance up to three months. It travels faster than 25 knots underwater and dives farther than 800 feet.

"It's much more effective than any ship I've been on before," said Capt. John Litherland, who has been on more than 50.

"It's not the fastest, but the difference is that it's quiet even at its top speed."

Perhaps the biggest improvement is the ability to travel with a small special forces submarine, nine commandos and their gear. Previous subs would have carried only three Navy SEALS.

That kind of space is premium on a vessel designed to hide and spend most of its life underwater.

Its maximum time submerged is limited only by the amount of food it can carry, because the boat generates its own power and oxygen.

Sailors sleep twelve to a room, on 6 1/2-foot beds with about 3 feet of top-to-bottom sleeping space, the 4-inch deep compartment under it the only place to stow belongings.

That's why they spent four weeks in basic training learning how to fold, crew members joke.

And they've grown to carry less stuff, after training to spend up to six months at a time in the middle of the ocean.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: navy; submarine; submarines; texas; thetexas; uss; virginiaclass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: george76

That baby is HUGE! Looks like a super tanker, 800'+ ?.


81 posted on 08/27/2006 9:09:53 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #82 Removed by Moderator

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle
"It's a trick photo"

LOL, sure fooled me! I've spend more then a littl etime at sea, and that thing looked as big as a super tanker. Biggest I ever saw at sea was 1180 ish Exxon something or other. Never saw an Aircraft carrier or BB at sea, which I had, most of my time at sea was in Gulf of Mexico, not to many war ships there.

84 posted on 08/27/2006 9:42:11 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

Comment #86 Removed by Moderator

To: shankbear
How about doing sea trials and ordinance trials in the Persian Gulf. OOOOOOPPPPS that nuke tipped missile went off course and slammed into Irans new toy nuclear reactor.

It's not that kind of boat. Not that it couldn't carry a torpedo launched cruise, but this baby is a spec ops boat.

87 posted on 08/28/2006 10:41:15 AM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

A hot tipped cruise missile would be fine. Crispy Muzzies with a broken nuke reactor. Toooo bad.


88 posted on 08/28/2006 10:48:49 AM PDT by shankbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

To: Non-Sequitur
Why anyone would take a perfectly good ship and deliberately sink it with the crew on board alway beat me.

Why anyone would take a perfectly good ship and leave it on the surface as an easy TARGET to get sunk with the crew on board always beat me.

At least submarines get to surface once for each time it dives. Targets don't get to do that.
90 posted on 08/28/2006 1:07:23 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

OMG! That's a hoot. This guy is everywhere.


91 posted on 08/28/2006 1:11:31 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
It's about 77 feet longer that the 300 foot pig I used to work on. Of course, this doesn't mean that there is any more livable space on board--that extra length is probably used by the VLS and lockout chamber. Those silly engineers don't make extra space for people.
92 posted on 08/28/2006 1:12:04 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76
...on 6 1/2-foot beds with about 3 feet of top-to-bottom sleeping space,...

Three foot tall racks....we used to call those Cadillac racks. Hell, 18 inches used to be premo...
93 posted on 08/28/2006 1:14:23 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

You know how when you put all your favorite albums on cassette tape and then go on tour with that and then listen to all of them the first day and there is still the whole tour to go? Nevermind, just reflecting on my pipeline days, which is much the same as being on a sub.


94 posted on 08/28/2006 1:16:14 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
At least we had cd's and gameboys. Luckily enough, people were nice about sharing. I did plenty of reading out to sea too. Of course, I got to do none of that when I was a nub.
95 posted on 08/28/2006 1:25:41 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: george76
As this is a sub-related article, I found this interesting page on the Royal Navy website, showing some interactive panoramic views of a Trafalgar class SSN.

In know it's one of ours rather than one of yours, but I thought it might be of interest to some of the sub guys here!

Trafalgar Class

97 posted on 08/29/2006 1:14:47 PM PDT by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da_Shrimp

Now make 5 more just for laughs and giggles. And 5 more carrier groups before lunch.


98 posted on 08/29/2006 4:12:15 PM PDT by samadams2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
At least submarines get to surface once for each time it dives. Targets don't get to do that.


Please keep in mind, to us airdales, subs are targets.
A6 INTRUDER tec
99 posted on 08/29/2006 5:15:34 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Three cheers for 'The Texas,' darlin!


100 posted on 08/29/2006 5:44:21 PM PDT by RDTF ("We love death. The US loves life. That is the big difference between us two.” Osama Bin laden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson