[Vn_survivor_67-68]

"This "War on Terror" is not one with clear objectives,...."

COUNTEROFFENSIVE TO ISLAMIC JIHAD
COUNTEROFFENSIVE TO ISLAMIC JIHAD
COUNTEROFFENSIVE TO ISLAMIC JIHAD
COUNTEROFFENSIVE TO ISLAMIC JIHAD
COUNTEROFFENSIVE TO ISLAMIC JIHAD

"War on Terror" is just plain wrong, misleading,and inadequate in many ways!

[edcoil]

The article confuses "Wars" and "battles" as the same which is not a reasonable position but the summary bothers me most in this embracing our allies clap. When have we had allies that we could, or would be our equal allies?

A nation has to do what a nation has to do to survive and the hell with embracing anying except killing your enemy.

[thoughtomator]

This "War on Terror" is not one with clear objectives, such as "if we take this town and this bridge, we will have accomplished our objective."

Sure it is. If we eliminate Islam from the face of the planet, we will have accomplished our objective.

[arthurus]

Unfortunately we will ultimately have to blow up entire cities and at least one entire country if we are going to win the Islamic War. The Mohammedans have to suffer a very visible very spectacular defeat, something akin to obliteration, to convince them that Allah does not will them to prevail in this generation. All the surgical precision in the world just convinces them they are on the right path because Allah is keepng the cities and most of the population from destruction.

[Valin]

Bump

[glorgau]

there is no longer the need to blow up an entire city when only a handful of buildings harbor the enemy.

But we can definitely still blow up the entire city. Great to have a range of options.