Replies

Well first of all, I want to know what claims you make. You know, 'Quid pro quo'. see freep mail

But to reply to you, Okay well it was scientist's that promoted it and scientist's that debunked it. So what is it that all the scientist's share?

Well it is the same thing we all share, so let's subtract all labels here, and what do we have? It is Humanity, and in that we/they share all the foibles/limitations and limitless potential.

While I did not mention 'current evolutionary biologists', they are not absolute authorities, so yes they fall under 'humanity' and are therefore subject to being seduced and blinded by their own desires. This condition is not removed by 'peer review'.

IMO, what some people understand as scientist's are simply people that have completed a science curriculum and have adopted all of its tenets without ever truly delving into the core. They then collect a salary in the workforce.,, This does not make their work 'truth'

W.

My beliefs("claims" if you prefer) are irrelevant. As such, I will not post them here or in email.

You have not answered my question. Furthermore, you haven't any evidence of this great seduction within recent scientific thought; a seduction so great, that men are willing to accept clearly fabricated results. Where is the evidence?