[RunningWolf]

Like I said there were a few doubters almost immediately way before 1924 (actually 1913) I think but they got not much of an audience.

Subtract the straw-men of 'the press and creationists' and you still have the seduction of scientists. The seduction continues today, and its all 'peer reviewed'.

Nice diversion. So much for 'science' and the scientific response. That however (a religious cult disguised as science) is a hallmark of the Darwinist.

Transitional hominid skull (composite) = imaginary creature.

W.

[Boxen]

You have yet to demonstrate your claim that current evolutionary biologists are somehow "seduced." Can you show a recent scientific forgery on the scale of Piltdown Man?

Piltdown Man was one of the great failures of paleontology, I agree. Nonetheless, it was a scientist who exposed it as a forgery.

The rest of your post is the usual rhetoric: "Evolution is a religion blah blah blah." I see no reason to address it.