To: oceanview
?would you buy a nuclear warhead from someone, without a demo? Would you? Are you aware that essentially, you (US Taxpayer) are 'buying' untested nuclear weapons?
We, the USA, haven't tested any of our nuclear warheads since 1992.
Thank you, William Jefferson Pervert Traitor Clinton.
The damage done to the United States by that foul creature, his shrew, and his cronies, is incalculable.
61 posted on
08/18/2006 8:14:35 PM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: ArrogantBustard
our stuff has stood the test of time.
To: ArrogantBustard
Would you? Are you aware that essentially, you (US Taxpayer) are 'buying' untested nuclear weapons?Different thing. We have successfully detonated several of each variant. It is like when you buy a rifle, and the barrel says "proof tested". We have "proof tested" our arsenal.
To: ArrogantBustard
"The damage done to the United States by that foul creature, his shrew, and his cronies, is incalculable."
That bears repeating.
Not sure how big a deal on the nuke testing though. I think most of the testing was done just to see what type of yields and damage they would do - rather than "testing" to make sure they work. And computer modeling has taken over determining the yields, damage, etc.
I believe that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were left in good condition for the Bombs so that the Japs could see the full effects of the Bombs, and also for our scientists to study.
89 posted on
08/18/2006 8:29:49 PM PDT by
geopyg
(If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
To: ArrogantBustard
Didn't we test a MOAB in FL?
130 posted on
08/18/2006 8:56:21 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson