INAZI!!!
Posted on 08/17/2006 3:15:07 PM PDT by neverdem
Islamic fascists is fine, but I prefer Hugh Hewitt's "Islamo-Nazis." I have no great reasoning behind this, I just like the way it sounds.
Nope, we are at war with muslims, period.
anything is better than "jihadists" which makes them Soldiers of God" which is an honorable title.
Any good fascist would recoil in horror at being compared to an islamic!
It's just that "islamic fascist" sounds ever so much more PC than simply calling them what they are:
islamic.
Let's cut the crap. We are at war with Islam.
Back to the Bush statement - if you are not with us, you are a'gin us.
Moslems are not showing a great deal of being with the West. Period.
"Islamic Fascism" is, of course, a tuatological expression.
We're damn sure Not at war with the Girl Scouts.
"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Qur'an should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth"
--Omar Ahmed, Chairman of the Board of CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations), San Ramon Valley Herald, July 1998
Hewitt might have been using the term "Islamofascism" in recent times, but I've posted the expression right here in FR as far back as 1997.
Is that "all" or "some"? I am uncomfortable with any statement that says we are targeting women and children, which is what "all" does.
The Nazis organized Moslems into active SS units in WWII. Other Freepers have posted standard, stock photos demonstrating it.
That statement, BTW, is justification for locking this guy up for insurrection against the United States. They are going to have to change some of their fundamental beliefs or we will have to expel them all.
No we are not, actually.
Islamism is what we are at war with, and Islamists would LOVE for us to be foolish enough to make enemies of a billion people.
INAZI!!!
You can't win a war if you can't name your Enemy!
The West has been casting about to find the right name
to call the Enemy we face in the War On Terror.
I nominate "Muslim Crusaders"
It's concise, rolls off the tongue easily, and as a
bonus, it rubs a thumb in the eye of their mercinary
apoligists like CAIR, and their friends the
perpetually offended.
Christianity went thru The Reformation after the
Crusades, Islam should be obliged to do the same after
the West ends the Muslim Crusades!
James Arlandson writes a great piece on the Muslim
Crusades that lead, after 465 years, to Pope Urban II
preaching the First Crusade in 1095 AD.
Included is a Timeline of the Muslim Crusades.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5024
Calling the Enemy "Muslim Crusaders" will also soften the Left's resolve vis a vis their insistance on rooting for the wrong side...nothing get's a Lib's panties in a bunch like a good old fashoned Crusade!
The constant naming of the Enemy as Crusaders will also help drive the point home to the Mythic "Muslim Moderate Majority"...
A constant reminder that the WOT IS their fight, it IS up to them to purge the Crusaders from their ranks, and to Reform their faith so it can peacefully join the 21st Century, where the rising tide raises all boats.
An invitation, if you will, to join the Human Family.
Isn't that Medved's term? Medved uses it constantly.
Hugh uses it too, maybe he swiped it from Michael.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.