More to follow......
1 posted on
08/17/2006 9:06:44 AM PDT by
sinkspur
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: sinkspur
2 posted on
08/17/2006 9:07:12 AM PDT by
TommyDale
(It's time to dismiss the Duke fake rape case, Mr. Nifong!)
To: sinkspur
Up next, federal judge rules Constitution really is a suicide pact!
3 posted on
08/17/2006 9:07:45 AM PDT by
TheConservator
(Confutatis maledictis flammis acribus addictis. . . .)
To: sinkspur
We're doomed...this on the heels of finding out that the recent plot in Britain was foiled in part due to listening to phone conversations between Pakistan and the UK.
Brilliant!
To: sinkspur
5 posted on
08/17/2006 9:07:56 AM PDT by
mystery-ak
(My Son, My Soldier, My Hero..............)
To: sinkspur
Been looking for it on AP... nada. Detroit huh? Figures.
What was the judges name btw?
6 posted on
08/17/2006 9:08:19 AM PDT by
AliVeritas
(Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
To: sinkspur; Sidebar Moderator
This should be in breaking
7 posted on
08/17/2006 9:08:27 AM PDT by
aynrandfreak
(The Left hates America)
To: sinkspur
Since I am a citizen, and the Government reports to me, can I rule "Tough Sh**" and have the surveillance left in place?
8 posted on
08/17/2006 9:08:34 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: sinkspur
Thanks for weighing in there Chippy, but the court really has no say on how the Commander-in-chief of the military chooses to conduct intelligence gathering on the enemy in a time of war.
9 posted on
08/17/2006 9:08:37 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: sinkspur
Oh, boo. No one gives a damn about a random judge's opinion on which country should win the WoT.
To: sinkspur
12 posted on
08/17/2006 9:09:23 AM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: sinkspur
To: sinkspur
I really think it's going to take an Islamic terrorist detonating a nuclear weapon on American soil before people finally get it. Even then, who knows?
To: sinkspur; All
17 posted on
08/17/2006 9:10:48 AM PDT by
avacado
To: sinkspur
I haven't heard anything about this ruling yet, but I am 100% confident anyhow that a federal judge did not rule that NSA surveillance is unconstitutional. I am certain that what you mean is that a federal judge ruled that warrantless NSA surveillance is unconstitutional.
19 posted on
08/17/2006 9:10:50 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: sinkspur
20 posted on
08/17/2006 9:10:53 AM PDT by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: sinkspur
Then let the judge enforce his ruling.
21 posted on
08/17/2006 9:10:56 AM PDT by
JamesP81
("Never let your schooling interfere with your education" --Mark Twain)
To: sinkspur
Durn Detroit News is full of breaking news re: Jon Benet
Nada re: surveillance
22 posted on
08/17/2006 9:11:00 AM PDT by
AliVeritas
(Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
To: sinkspur
I expect that this stupid ruling will ultimately be overturned.
23 posted on
08/17/2006 9:11:18 AM PDT by
roaddog727
(Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
To: sinkspur
What a joke. Like that is going to stand. Impeach the quisling.
25 posted on
08/17/2006 9:11:51 AM PDT by
pissant
To: sinkspur
A winning issue for the mid term elections. Let's see the Democrat hands for thinking NSA surveillance is unconstitutional.
Levin and Lamont are about the only two hands we'd see raised. Ask Stabenow how she feels on this!
26 posted on
08/17/2006 9:12:45 AM PDT by
Republican Red
(Everyone is super stoked on Gore, even if they don't know it)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson