[semaj]

A reasonable question. I believe in order to wage an effective war we have to first identify who we are at war with. If for whatever reason we refuse to or cannot do this, then we shouldn't send our young men and women into harms way on a false premise.

Don't ge tme wrong, I dance a jigg whenever a dirty jihadist is sent to allah. I can't remeber if it was MacArthur or Patton, that commented on the immorality of limited warfare.

If we are to engage in warfare, sending are young men and women to possibly die or be gravely injured, in the process, than we should have the guts to call out our enmey by name and kick the living shit out of him, until he cries uncle or until he is dead.

[pcottraux]

I don't care what they call it. They can call it the war on hot dogs for all I care. Just DESTROY THE ENEMY!!!

You're actually suggesting that we surrender to terrorism and let the Islamofascists take over the Middle East, and then continue to bomb, destroy, and kill us, just because you don't like the name of the war they've settled with?

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

I, for one totally agree with your statement.

[ARealMothersSonForever]

If we are to engage in warfare, sending are young men and women to possibly die or be gravely injured, in the process, than we should have the guts to call out our enmey by name and kick the living shit out of him, until he cries uncle or until he is dead.

bttt

[rvoitier]

A reasonable question. I believe in order to wage an effective war we have to first identify who we are at war with.

We're at war against the ones with the bombs. The ones who have connections to known terrorists who would kill you, your parents, your nieces and nephews.

If for whatever reason we refuse to or cannot do this, then we shouldn't send our young men and women into harms way on a false premise.

Sorry your hatred for Bush and apologies for Clinton doesnt allow you to see that there is a global jihad against western civilization. False premise? Ask your beloved Clintons, Kerry, Edwards, Biden, Schumer, et al about that. Oh yeah! I forgot, that idiot doofus Bush out-smarted them even with access to the same intel. lol

Don't ge tme wrong, I dance a jigg whenever a dirty jihadist is sent to allah. I can't remeber if it was MacArthur or Patton, that commented on the immorality of limited warfare.

I don't remember the saying but it sounds like it would've been from MacArthur because of this desire to take Japan, too, when Truman called him off.

If we are to engage in warfare, sending are young men and women to possibly die or be gravely injured, in the process, than we should have the guts to call out our enmey by name and kick the living shit out of him, until he cries uncle or until he is dead.

Don't know about "calling out our enemy by name," but I do agree with kicking the shit out them. This war should've been over a year ago.
But the global jihad continues and we need results (dead/imprisoned terrorists) far above just naming them.

[danamco]

A reasonable question. I believe in order to wage an effective war we have to first identify who we are at war with. If for whatever reason we refuse to or cannot do this, then we shouldn't send our young men and women into harms way on a false premise.

Since YOU are over there, shouldn't you have a clear picture as who to identify in this battle???