Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiteKnight
Evolution is bad sceince and its' theory does not pass the sceintific method.

This was not a statement of assertion but a supposition; nor was it blatant; note the operative words "may be". So your are actually incorrect in your assumption. Have a good evening.

Ah -- please show me where the words "may be" are in your post (above).

Did you think they would magically appear? Your blatant assertion is just that.

I would suggest you not prevaricate when it is so easy to get the evidence.

Oh, and let me help you! "sceince" is spelled science.

(enjoying your shoe-leather?)

120 posted on 08/13/2006 5:52:07 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Democrat Party stands for open treason in a time of war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003
Please go back and re-read your post #85. "may be" is right there where you copied from my previous post. As that is the only part of my post you refered to, it seemed reasonable to assume that is what you were calling blatant. If you are refering to any other part of the post you should have indicated so. I stand by what I posted about the theory of evolution.

W.K.

132 posted on 08/13/2006 6:02:01 PM PDT by WhiteKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003
Additionally, I don't lie or do magic.

W.K.

134 posted on 08/13/2006 6:03:02 PM PDT by WhiteKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson