Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Antarctic Snowfall Snafu Derails Climate Models
National Science Foundation ^ | 11 Aug 2006 | National Science Foundation

Posted on 08/11/2006 9:42:17 PM PDT by Marius3188

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: My2Cents
Re: Al Gore's going to need to find a new line of work.

Manbearpig will survive!

21 posted on 08/11/2006 11:13:24 PM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

That's interesting. I thought with global warming, hurricane season will be more active each year?


22 posted on 08/11/2006 11:16:07 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
Not to defend them but don't the majority of the Hurricanes come in the end of the season. Warmer water and all that...

That is true, but the US hurricane center has also downgraded their predictions of hurricane activity for this year..
Instead of 4 to 6 "major" hurricanes this season, they now predict 3 to 4..

Of course, that's not to say that next year may not be bad, just that this year isn't expected to be as bad as they thought..

23 posted on 08/12/2006 12:15:48 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom... Not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
"Of course, that's not to say that next year may not be bad, just that this year isn't expected to be as bad as they thought.."

What ever. People are so stupid to place day to day occurrences as part of a global trend. You need hundreds of years of records to validate things like global warming

They can get some of that from ice core and tree ring records but still... for now global warming is a myth and a tool for the enviro weenies (socialists) to try to obtain their ends.

The real fools are those who fall for it.
24 posted on 08/12/2006 12:24:35 AM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
I don't disagree with the idea that global climate is (slowly) warming...
I think there's sufficient evidence of natural climate change to validate the "probability" that it's getting warmer..

What I argue with is whether there is an appreciable human-induced affect.

There is a possiblility that climate change could reverse it's trend tomorrow..
Ten years from now, we could be in the beginnings of a cooling trend that lasts a decade, 50 years, 100...
We simply don't know..

Scientists and politicians would do better concerning themselves with how to deal with it than trying to correct it..
The very idea that mankind can force an entire planet to do anything at all is the height of egotism, in my opinion..

Let's see them make it rain in areas stricken with drought, or stop a hurricane..
Then, maybe I'll listen to how they have the answer for global warming..
And it ain't Kyoto treaties..

25 posted on 08/12/2006 12:43:28 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom... Not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
precipitation levels in the Antarctic have in fact remained steady. The upshot of the study is that models assessing climate-change may need to be revised, as they can no longer be deemed accurate.

The validity of a model must be judge by how well it makes predictions about the world. Now suppose you make a prediction with your model and it's wrong. If you just take new data that contradicts your model and tweak the parameters to be consistent with the new data, it is now fit to that new data. The model no longer makes predictions about that data that may be used to validate the model.

With enough settable parameters, you could continue this process forever and never have a model that makes usable predictions about reality. There are, for example, proofs that you can fit any set of data points with a line to any desired degree of accuracy using only polynomials. So you just keep adding polynomial terms and tweaking parameters and you get your perfect fit. But these fits are almost always really bad fits in terms of predicting the values of unknown points. They are "overfit."

In a way, this approach is similar to the Ptolemaic circles-within-circles approach to explaining an earth-centered solar system. Each time a new, inconsistent fact was discovered, more circles were added. The model fit the known data quite nicely. But it did a terrible job of predicting new data.

26 posted on 08/12/2006 12:48:00 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

ping


27 posted on 08/12/2006 4:27:32 AM PDT by N2Gems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Geez, measuring snowfall in the Antarctic. How does one get such a cushy job??????


28 posted on 08/12/2006 4:28:54 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
The upshot of the study is that models assessing climate-change may need to be revised, as they can no longer be deemed accurate.

Surprise, surprise, surprise. We can't even accurately forecast the weather five days out, but agenda-driven climate scientists claim they can model climate fifty years into the future. Looks like the only hot air is coming from their pieholes.

But of course, we're the uninformed dolts for not accepting their "science" as gospel.

29 posted on 08/12/2006 4:31:41 AM PDT by dirtboy (Why does Israel take border security seriously but we do not, when Islamists wish us both harm?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301; CWOJackson
You might find this interesting:

Was an imminent Ice Age predicted in the '70's? No

30 posted on 08/12/2006 4:38:59 AM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Al Gore's going to need to find a new line of work.

More inconvenient truth for Al.

31 posted on 08/12/2006 4:49:08 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188
Albore.....HE PLAYED ON OUR FEARS!!!!

The left is just so pathetic. And note too that McCain has declared gorbal worming the most serious threat to mankind!

32 posted on 08/12/2006 4:52:18 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drammach

There is a possiblility that climate change could reverse it's trend tomorrow. Ten years from now, we could be in the beginnings of a cooling trend that lasts a decade, 50 years, 100... We simply don't know..

If historic cycles are a prelude to the future we do know or at least have high degree of confidence.

Want to see an enviro-whacko's head explode? Show 'em this.

The following graphs show that Earth is in a brief period of global warming called an interglacial. The longer time spans, the deep troughs are glacial periods. The line that runs across the graphs is the temperature in 1950 and listed as "0" on the left axis.

As can be seen in the last graph (Figure 1-5), Earth appears ready to move toward another ice age in the cycle.

I'm more concerned with sustaining global warming to offset global cooling and the next ice age.

Ice Ages & Astronomical Causes
Brief Introduction to the History of Climate
by Richard A. Muller

Origin of the 100 kyr Glacial Cycle

This first graph looks bad, doesn't it -- steeper upward temperature trend. Horizontal red line is temperature at 1950.

Figure 1-1 Global warming

The second graph shows today's temperature isn't out of the norm. Horizontal blue line is temperature at 1950.

Figure 1-2 Climate of the last 2400 years

The next graph shows a downtrend in temperatures from 8,000 years ago to today. The down trend is steeper in the recent 2,000 years. From left to right the upper spikes have lower highs while the lower spikes have lower lows. (The same effect can be seen in Figure 1-2, above.) 

Figure 1-3 Climate of the last 12,000 years

This graph shows that agriculture and  stationary societies emerged 8,000 years ago during a time frame when global temperature was much higher than normal, or average.

Figure 1-4 Climate of the last 100,000 years

The next graph shows that the recent 8,000 years was one of five brief hot spikes when glaciers were at minimums. With much longer troughs when glacials (ice ages) were the norm most of the time.

Figure 1-5 Climate for the last 420 kyr, from Vostok ice

The graph below is reversed. That is, the left side is present day and the right side is 3 million years ago. It shows a 3 million year down trend toward widening extremes in the temperature cycle.

Figure 1-6 Climate for the last 3 million years


33 posted on 08/12/2006 5:02:31 AM PDT by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Indeed, don't you know that when it comes to "global warming," all news is bad news? It was increased snowfall in Antarctica that held out hope for mankind (and global warming theorists) that maybe sea-level rises would not accompany the theorized (in fact, presumed) human-induced warming.

"The team's findings also counter climate-change skeptics who consider a thickening of Antarctica's enormous ice sheets has stemmed the gradual rise in global sea levels."

Note that this quote calls even people who believe in human-induced global warming "skeptics" if they only do not believe in accompanying floods.

34 posted on 08/12/2006 5:19:40 AM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

How long before this is in the NYT?


35 posted on 08/12/2006 6:05:15 AM PDT by Clara Lou (A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

Global Warming is a religion. It cannot be refuted by facts.


36 posted on 08/12/2006 6:22:56 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Owning a Hybrid is a badge of honor telling the world you failed thermodynamics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ckilmer; demlosers; ...
topic from last month.

· Catastrophism ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark ·

37 posted on 09/07/2006 8:03:02 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Just adding this to the GGG catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

38 posted on 09/07/2006 8:04:44 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
Al Gore invented the iPod.

Figures, he's clearly a pod person...

39 posted on 09/07/2006 8:07:12 AM PDT by null and void (Islamic communities belong in Islamic countries.- Eric in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson