Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flying? New TSA Carry-On Baggage Rules
http://channels.isp.netscape.com/whatsnew/default.jsp?story=20060810-1252 ^ | 8-10-06

Posted on 08/10/2006 10:54:02 AM PDT by Hydroshock

If you're flying soon, the rules concerning what you may and may not carry onto the plane with you just changed in response to the arrest in the United Kingdom of people accused of plotting to destroy aircraft bound from England to the United States by exploding liquids in their carry-on bags. Find out the details of this thwarted terrorist plot.

Effective Thursday, Aug. 10, travelers are no longer allowed to bring the following items on board the airliner: --All liquids of any kind, including drinks --Gels --Lotions and creams, including hand lotion and sunscreen --Contacts may be brought on board in their cases, but the cases cannot contain liquid. --Hairspray --Toothpaste --Shampoo and conditioner --Liquid makeup --Perfume --Anything else that has a liquid or gel-like consistency.

Higher security means long lines and chaos in airports nationwide.

If you bring any of these items through airport security, TSA agents will confiscate them from your carry-on luggage; however, you may still place them in checked luggage. Some exceptions are granted for passengers traveling with an infant or small child. Baby formula, juice, bottled breast milk and baby food are allowed, but they will be tested by the TSA to ensure they are not explosives. Prescription drugs, insulin and some nonprescription medication are also allowed with proper identification. The new procedures cover all flights, both international and domestic. Currently, laptop computers, cell phones and other electronic devices are allowed, but that is subject to change.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last
To: Hydroshock

This is just so pathetic, Lets take all fliers waters, toothpaste, and Ipod’s away, call for
Patients and understanding, what a joke…

Maybe taking away electronic toys and drinks will wakeup & outrage the American public enough to call for profiling of Arab/Islamic fliers (Doubt it).


121 posted on 08/10/2006 12:33:53 PM PDT by GoShow (Feminist divorce panic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

What is the current status re: laptops and electronics on U.S. flights? I just heard conflicting information. TSA web site just mentions the liquids now.


122 posted on 08/10/2006 12:36:49 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

Which I will.


123 posted on 08/10/2006 12:38:14 PM PDT by Xenalyte (I dub thee Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, beater of ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Good Lord! My eyes are going to hurt when I can't take out my lenses after having them in for 12-18 hours all because I can't take my Boston Cleaner Conditioning Lotion onboard. Ouch! I'm going to lose one of them for sure. This ticks me off.


124 posted on 08/10/2006 12:40:40 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

This just confirms my current travel plans for Thanksgiving and Christmas. I was planning to drive then and I'm still planning to drive.


125 posted on 08/10/2006 12:40:45 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: APRPEH

Men and, especially, women, have bodily cavities where objects of a substantial size can be secreted. To remove those objects and assemble a bomb from them would be quite simple.


126 posted on 08/10/2006 12:42:58 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Which I will.

Probably a great idea!

127 posted on 08/10/2006 1:08:25 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

As a businessman who just changed a 5PM flight today to a 6AM flight tomorrow because of the security fubar, I agree totally with you.
I couldn't operate on travel without this machine or the cellphone.


128 posted on 08/10/2006 1:11:05 PM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GoShow

Agreed. Basically the terrorists have won. Not what they really wanted (killing all of us) but by creating terror which leads to infringement on our liberties.

In typical government bureaucrat fashion, TSA has overreacted by banning all liquids. From what I've read, the terrorists planned to ignite a peroxide solution with a camera flash or other electronics. Of course, it would be very easy to screen for peroxide - simply use a sniff test and/or make people drink from their carry-on bottles. Wouldn't it be fun to see Mohammed gurgling with peroxide?

Instead the TSA bans all liquids - rather absurd and something that can't possibly last past the next Congressional recess.

I am all for taking precautions but there is always a tradeoff. Reducing the speed limit to 55 mph saved lives, and no doubt 45mph would save even more. But at some point you need to draw the line.


129 posted on 08/10/2006 1:19:12 PM PDT by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: APRPEH

The rules of the Israeli Airline are sufficient.


130 posted on 08/10/2006 1:21:57 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

I live in Hawaii and have to fly to see my dealers on the neighbor islands weekly. I also have to fly to the mainland several times a year(Last month to Elyria, OH and San Diego, next month to Spearfish, SD and Anaheim, CA, October to San Antonio, January to Dallas etc.) There is simply no other option but to fly.

My boss won't let me sail my boat on business trips. He says it takes too long d;^)


131 posted on 08/10/2006 1:22:06 PM PDT by Chuckster (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

THEY need to furnish more liquids.


132 posted on 08/10/2006 1:22:55 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: VOA
Send stuff ahead to your destination by FedEx/UPS/DHL. (yeah, I know it's too pricey for most, but I bet some well-heeled travelers will do it)

I routinely do that on the return leg of my business trips because I usually collect a lot of printed material that is too heavy to lug around the airport. Guess I'll start shipping some stuff ahead too.

133 posted on 08/10/2006 1:25:20 PM PDT by Chuckster (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sharpee

"My daughter in law has a 9 month hold."

On what?


134 posted on 08/10/2006 1:28:47 PM PDT by toddlintown (IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NearlyNormal
Perhaps by running everyone through a bomb-proof device that contains a multitude of electronic signaling devices that are capable of detonating anything that may be in, on, or about each person?

Make sure to keep that frequency above 20 Hz or so, lest you accidentally produce the mythical "brown note" here and there.

135 posted on 08/10/2006 1:59:03 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

>two drops of Victor Xray can off the entire planeload.<

Ok, the only "Victor Xray" I know of is an old style Xray tube. What the h. e. double hocky pucks do you mean???


136 posted on 08/10/2006 2:45:10 PM PDT by Darnright (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

Ah ha! Good old dogpile told me what you were talking about. Ok, IF this isn't about explosives after all, you make a very salient point.

Blasted terrorists are going to have all of us back in spectacles - the horror!!!


137 posted on 08/10/2006 2:50:13 PM PDT by Darnright (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
I think a lot of people are just going to stop flying local amusement vendors business will skyrocket. Although I have been to Asia three times in the past three years, I'm thinking domestic adventures for the next few years...
138 posted on 08/10/2006 2:57:48 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: t1b8zs
"... I take my 97 YO aunt (timmonium) up here to Covenrty, CT ..." Timmonium? Is that anything like unobtainium?
139 posted on 08/10/2006 3:23:03 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NearlyNormal
[One could eliminate people with surgically implanted bombs] Perhaps by running everyone through a bomb-proof device that contains a multitude of electronic signaling devices that are capable of detonating anything that may be in, on, or about each person?

So much for all the pacemaker users out there; kiss 'em goodbye. I think your proposed method would snuff the pacemakers.

140 posted on 08/10/2006 3:43:25 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson