Posted on 08/09/2006 10:17:04 PM PDT by gary_b_UK
Ok, I don't know if these cases involved hijacking over water, but here's a couple of fellows (not associated with each other as far as I know from cyber travels) that should be found.
---
Here Mugniyah's Wanted Poster:
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/termugniyah.htm
Here's the most current photo purportedly to be Mugniyah:
http://www.waronline.org/terror/bin%20laden/mugniyah-2.jpg
===
===
Here is Lya's Wanted Poster:
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/seekinfo/lya.htm
Here's more information on Lya:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jamal+Lya%22&hl=en&lr=&filter=0
I'd say you're right. These usually come out two weeks prior to an event.
QUOTE:
http://osint.internet-haganah.com/archives/000531.html
August 10, 2006
"it was really strange"
Love this quote, from the guy across the street from one of the raided
houses in the UK. Did he call the police? No, it appears not.
Thursday August 10, 2006 - Guardian:
"It was sold overnight. One day it was up for sale and the next it was
gone. I think two men moved in the following weekend. No furniture was
moved or anything, it was really strange."
Mr Weir said he believed two north African men had been living in the flat
for about a month.
He said: "They were in their mid-thirties. They were dressed quite normally
in T-shirts and trousers. I haven't seen them in the last couple of weeks.
There is not often anyone there at that house."
Posted on 10 August 2006 @ 19:23 GMT
"Check this out Fred!"
I am! Only another two thousand or so to go...Our TV news reported last night that the monitoring of this group had been going on for nine months or so, the plan was to explode the 'planes over cities.
Anyone on earth who doesn't know what islam is by now, is either stupid, wilfully ignorant or a complete and utter coward.
Imagine OWNING a bottle of Chanel No. 5
"How many Muslims work in the airport and have easy access to the aircraft in their various positions, as well as to the passengers..."
I shudder each time I think of it, in Oz, we have a felllow in court on terrorism charges right now, who was a former baggage handler at an international airport.
praying for your safe return.. bummer on timing/location
There is win/win
looks like you found lose/lose
This is bigger than we know!
LOL....Ooops
Because thats the PROFILE of the bombers up to now. Sure it's possible, and if they want to screen every ME male from 12 to 80 it's fine with me. BUT for now the money is in the group thats proven itself a risk time after time.
I know and was going to alude to that idiot rule myself.
..it was probably part of her makeup kit.
I usually keep my Clinique..moisturizer in my little makeup bag.
Why would she need it with her..
.....I think most women keep their cosmetics close by :))
...you don't want to be caught stranded without your makeup!
I can accept that they had their eyes on some (possibly even all) of the scumbags -- but I do NOT accept the idea that *something* didn't grab 'em by surprise in the wee hours of last night. SOMETHING happened that put them into instant pucker-mode, FAST, with NO warning. Something they did NOT expect to happen last night. Otherwise, they wouldn't have needed to wake GWB and MC (and all the others who got "the phone call" in the middle of the night). They would have already been up, waiting for whatever to happen. For that matter, strike that -- they would have been sleeping, because the perps would have been taken down before it became necessary to go into ultra-quickstep mode.
>>>>>I know that now they're saying they were tracking this situation for months, but I don't buy it.I agree with most of your comment, but this. I do believe they've been tracking it - but also having to keep the information out of the hands of traitors such as the New York Times.
[...]
well, not anymore...
unless they come out with airport safe stuff.....which they probably will....
Call me cynical if you like, but I'm gonna venture a guess that the answer is "never". It ain't gonna happen, period. We're not the country we were in the 1940s. We're soft, dumbed-down, obsesed with not pissing off our enemies, rather than having victory over them. "Victory" is a dirty word. We're no longer willing to WIN a war. We only fight to stalemate.
Before anyone jumps me over that, think it through. Yeah, we got Saddam, but "getting Saddam" does not equate to "victory". Compare the current stalemate in Iraq with the postwar scenario in Japan and Germany. THEN, we went about things in an entirely different way. We made damn sure that the ENEMY knew that he was DEFEATED, and that he answered to US, and us alone. That broken sword on the deck of the battleship was more than symbolic. It was the end of a regime, from top to bottom. There was a new boss in town, and he didn't worry about "offending" the vanquished.
And if anyone thinks that sort of treatment is "cruel" and "insensitive", well, look at what happened to Germany and Japan AFTER we "gave 'em the treatment." They seem to have fared quite well.
No, we're not going to do what you suggest. We're going to keep muddling along, and the end state is not likely to be very pretty. I am NOT an optimist.
I think you're on the right track.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.