Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Running the numbers on a Lieberman-Lamont-Schlesinger race
NRO ^ | 8/9/2006 | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 08/09/2006 6:08:31 PM PDT by Jameison

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: driftless2
As if Lamont won't be even more liberal with the added distinction of being anti-defense. Use your head, it's either the pro-defense Lieberman or the anti-defense Lamont. Choose wisely.

I can't vote there anyway! Like Rush says:"A tiger is a tiger" and "a liberal is a liberal"!!

It's like saying "my wife i just a little bit pregnant"!!!

Apart for Joe's stand on Homeland Security, he still is a liberal turncoat!??!

41 posted on 08/10/2006 9:01:23 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: danamco
"liberal turncoat"

Is that your point? So if a politician other than Lieberman leaves the Democrats to officially join the Republicans, he would then also be a "turncoat" ??!!?? I'm at a loss to understand your and the other anti-Lieberman posters positions. If he does not run in November as an independent, Lamont will certainly win. Let me repeat: THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE HAS NO CHANCE!!!! Why in the world would you want a peacenik liberal like Lamont to win? Answer me that please.

42 posted on 08/10/2006 1:37:16 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
I predict Lieberman will win, and announce a party change to the GOP the day the new Congress is sworn in.

Yes, he could win, but a party change is highly unlikely. He had the last year or two to switch parties, with many Republicans saying good things about him and people in his own party showing contempt. But he hasn't availed himself of the opportunity until now, which probably signals that he's not going to do so at all.

43 posted on 08/10/2006 10:33:31 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
"liberal turncoat"

Is that your point? So if a politician other than Lieberman leaves the Democrats to officially join the Republicans, he would then also be a "turncoat" ??!!?? I'm at a loss to understand your and the other anti-Lieberman posters positions.

Turncoat??? Remember in 2000 when gore picked loserman as vp candidate, he left all his previous religious beliefs at home and cozy-ing very much up to the hollywood left crowd???

44 posted on 08/11/2006 10:26:57 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Life is many times a choice between bad and worse. I disagree with Joe Lieberman on just about every domestic issue you can think of. But in the war on Islamo-fascism, Joe gets it. Lamont is a Neville Chamberlain-style appeaser. So therefor it is no choice. We must support Lieberman.


45 posted on 08/12/2006 1:28:55 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson