[beeler]

The Pajama Media strikes again!

[50sDad]

LOL. Once again, the Pajama Brigade forces the MSM to admit it's lies! Freedom Forever!

[dirtboy]

"There is no graver breach of Reuters standards for our photographers than the deliberate manipulation of an image," Szlukovenyi said in a statement.

But pictures of staged events are still acceptable.

[tobyhill]

"his work showed he had altered two images"

2 out of 920 is blatant Reuters BS! They know darn well that he has doctored all of them in some fashion. It maybe as simple as adjusting the light but it's only done to sensationalize the scene and not to show the true scene.

[mtbopfuyn]

There is no graver breach of Reuters standards for our photographers than the deliberate manipulation of an image

Yeah, we know about Reuters standards. They finally got hauled on the carpet over ONE guy. Now, to go after the others.

[frogjerk]

Reuters should post all of the pictures on a special website for all to see and investigate. Reuters shouldn't be allowed to self police...they cannot be trusted.

[EternalHope]

Withdrawing the photos sounds like a "clean-up" effort, but I really doubt that is the actual purpose.

I suspect Reuters wants to make it harder to find more of the fakes this guy is responsible for. Find too many fakes and people might start looking at OTHER Reuters stuff as well...

[dinasour]

Removing the images from the Reuters database excludes them from future sale.

And, more importantly, future scrutiny.

[Republican Red]

It seems it isn't just this particular Reuters photographer -

Another Reuters picture problem courtesy Drinking from Home

Extreme Makeover - Beirut Edition


Either this woman is the unluckiest multiple home-owner in Beirut, or something isn't quite right.

A Lebanese woman wails after looking at the wreckage of her apartment, in a building, that was demolished by the Israeli attacks in southern Beirut July 22, 2006. REUTERS/Issam Kobeisi





A Lebanese woman reacts at the destruction after she came to inspect her house in the suburbs of Beirut, Lebanon, Saturday, Aug. 5, 2006, after Israeli warplanes repeatedly bombed the area overnight.(AP Photo/Hussein Malla)

Same clothes, same scar on her left cheek, same mark under her right eye. Two pictures of the same woman, maybe even taken on the same day. So, what gives?

[agrace]

Hmm, methinks they want to avoid further scrutiny.

[kcmt01]

"Reuters has zero tolerance for any doctoring of pictures"
Does that mean Reuters tolerates staged pictures??

[tsmith130]

Does anyone know of or have the other doctored picture?

[OldFriend]

And now Rooters needs to start investigating the commentary that went along with the fake pictures.

[RightWhale]

the deliberate manipulation of an image

Needs a different qualifier than 'deliberate'. All news media published images are manipulated to some degree.

[Tijeras_Slim]

Down the memory hole.

[Blogger]

The damage has already been done. Reuters should have screened this guys work before publication. Most of his photos look staged or "sensationalized."

[InterceptPoint]

An immediate enquiry began into Hajj's other work.

It established on Monday that a photograph of an Israeli F-16 fighter over Nabatiyeh, southern Lebanon and dated Aug 2, had also been doctored to increase the number of flares dropped by the plane from one to three.

This implies that it was Reuters that found the 2nd photo. Not true. You cannot even trust this article from Reuters to tell you the truth.

[CindyDawg]

So...did you guys save before they pulled them? :')

[Peach]

Excellent! Just excellent.

[gophergas]

Sounds like the war on Reutorrism is ON!