you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn't look good.
...
He said forget it, nobody's going into 7, there's creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10 minutes after that, Visconti, he was on West Street, and I guess he had another report of further damage either in some basements and things like that, so Visconti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing and that was abandoned.
"Nobody goes in" I think that would include your imaginary demolition crew. By the way, as far as I know, firefighters don't do building demolitions, professional demolition experts do that.
here's a paper by a demolition industry pro about WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7.
http://www.implosionworld.com/WTC%20COLLAPSE%20STUDY%20BBlanchard%208-8-06.pdf
You don't have good reading comprehension and memory skills, I can see.
Let me repeat my original statement:
" . . . there is a remote possibility that because it did resemble the configuration of a demolition, the buildings may have been wired for demolition when they were constructed years ago in anticipation of the day they would have to be demolished."
[. . . snip . . .}
and:
"Building 7 must have been wired long before 9/11 "
No conspiracy. Just a possibility.
Now put your knee joint back in place and rule out the possibility that at least Building 7 may have been pre-wired, not hours or even days before it came down, but years ago.
Perhaps the bulding insurers would have an answer for you -- whether it was pre-wired or not. I remember reading a long discussion or report on that subject, but have since lost the link.
Why is it important to you to believe that the bullding was not wired and came down as a result of the fire alone?