You don't have good reading comprehension and memory skills, I can see.
Let me repeat my original statement:
" . . . there is a remote possibility that because it did resemble the configuration of a demolition, the buildings may have been wired for demolition when they were constructed years ago in anticipation of the day they would have to be demolished."
[. . . snip . . .}
and:
"Building 7 must have been wired long before 9/11 "
No conspiracy. Just a possibility.
Now put your knee joint back in place and rule out the possibility that at least Building 7 may have been pre-wired, not hours or even days before it came down, but years ago.
Perhaps the bulding insurers would have an answer for you -- whether it was pre-wired or not. I remember reading a long discussion or report on that subject, but have since lost the link.
Why is it important to you to believe that the bullding was not wired and came down as a result of the fire alone?
Because there is plenty of evidence that the building was heavily damaged and fell due to that damage and the fire.
As for your idea that the building was wired for demolition during construction, I find that idea bizarre and fanciful. Has that ever been done before?
Does that mean just the wiring? I assume they wouldn't put the explosives in their while the place was being built!
Do you have any evidence to back up your opinions?
I have presented documented testimony from a firefighter that was there and analysis by a demolition expert.
What do you have to back up your ideas?
here's a photo of WTC7 on fire with the aforementioned gaping hole.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/536/239/1600/wtc7_2.jpg
source
http://911yj.blogspot.com/2006/08/wtc-7-photo-for-visually-impaired.html
