Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas

I thought I read that it was 6 to 4 for weakening the science standards. That means that if even one of the existing creatioinism voters loses, it should be a tie - that should really snarl things up.

I read on ABC's website that the existing proscience vote, Waugh, a dem, held onto her seat. They also said two of three of the creationists were leading, and the open seat (previously creationist) was still a toss up.

Anyone have anything later?


95 posted on 08/01/2006 9:31:02 PM PDT by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: retMD

Ok, so far:

Bacon won, Waugh won, and that's all I can find with names.


96 posted on 08/01/2006 9:35:23 PM PDT by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: retMD

looks like at least a one-seat evolutionist lead now, perhaps more after the general


111 posted on 08/02/2006 9:50:24 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson