Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to Create a Legitimate World Organization
FamilySecurityMatters.org ^ | July 28, 2006 | Frank Salvato

Posted on 07/28/2006 6:36:44 AM PDT by mmccarroll

Time after time the United Nations has been given the opportunity to “do what was right” in the eyes of the innocent and tortured, the threatened and the oppressed existing throughout the world. And time after time they have chosen a politically influenced globalist ideology over action and inaction over saving lives.

It is well past time that the United States takes the initiative in closing the history book on this ineffective and dangerous organization of ideologues, do-nothings, bureaucrats and criminals.

(Excerpt) Read more at familysecuritymatters.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geopolitics; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: RoadTest

Not really. The UN was established to give each nation an equal say, at least in the General Assembly. There is absolutely no discrimination between nations based on their internal systems and structures. If there was, maybe we'd see some results.


21 posted on 07/28/2006 7:05:53 AM PDT by mmccarroll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mmccarroll
I've been saying this for 4 years, and so have many others. My view is that only the opinions of democratic regimes are worthy of respect. The votes of nations that are dictatorships are simply reflective of the will of one person, or a small subset of the people of one nation, and therefore do not represent the beliefs of that nation.

The true world body should be the "League of Free Peoples". The views of this body might be worthy of respect. No resolution of a body of dictators should carry any weight.

The League of Free Peoples could perhaps have a "Chamber of Dictators", where they allow the representatives of dictatorships to spout their views, and sometimes there is merit to hearing what they have to say. But they would not be allowed to participate in the debate on resolutions and policy.

That would be an organization that we might not always agree with, but which we could at least give consideration to.

22 posted on 07/28/2006 8:22:33 AM PDT by Defiant (Arnold has become a democrat, and does not deserve the votes of conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I can understand dumping the UN but why would we want to replace it?

My point exactly. We would just get more of the same so why bother? Just get rid of the UN.

23 posted on 07/28/2006 9:00:42 AM PDT by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mmccarroll

How you can you have a legitimate world organization when most world governments are run by criminals?


24 posted on 07/28/2006 9:03:45 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
"Frankly, I think the problems with the UN are inherent in that sort of organization."

The Tower of Babel comes to mind.

25 posted on 07/28/2006 9:06:39 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson