Skip to comments.
Army dismisses gay soldier 'outed' by e-mail
AP ^
| 7/27/6
| DUNCAN MANSFIELD
Posted on 07/27/2006 7:39:00 AM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 301-303 next last
To: whatisthetruth
To: whatisthetruth Yep, I agree. The reason our culture has broken down and gotten to this point is we let the Left push things to this point. At some point ground has to be held and the imbeciles told to STFU and sit the hell back down.
Until the Pro-Militant-Homosexual-Agenda-Pushers both on Freep & in their home base, the Democrat Party of America and it's assorted degenerate NAMBLA minions state that they fully support the "right" of gay siblings of the same sex to marry - then this whole homosexual agenda push by the Left and it's sympathizers is pure bullshit and disingenuous. It's a smokescreen to the Leftist agenda in general and we all know it.
It goes right back to the same thing - Gays and their supporters want a new "protected class" of "victims" and they want access to money,grants, special "rights" and ultimately a national right to marry and that it be accepted in all states no matter what you and the folks in your particular state have to say about it.
Let's hear the Left and the various hard core homosexual supporters here state why open gays should be accepted by the military BUT that two homosexual brothers or two homosexual sisters cannot marry.
Can't answer that lucidly? Didn't think so. Check and mate.
DADT - that's as far as we'll compromise. Don't like it? Move to another nation more to your liking.
This whole RED Herring premise that "Oh my GOD! If we don't hire Gays in our 1,200,000 man military (varying number up or down any given day) then WE CAN'T WIN ANY WARS!
Pure rubbish. That premise is a pantload. What a total crock and only idiots on the Left would belive or try to pitch some crap like that.
Besides, the last thing the DemocRATS are in favor of is America winning any wars. The RAT party has a long history of being opposed to America and there is no sugar coating it.
To: Retired Army Special Forces
Actually if you would do your research you would see that I have spoken out several times in these forums against gay issues especially gay marriage. I have never spoken out for democrats or their anti American antics.
But that doesn't matter Cause people like you don't care about research or the facts you are set in your ways and will never change them. A gay man or woman could save your life in combat or in any situation and once you found out they were gay you would tell them to leave you there and let you continue to be hurt. All becuase you believe in stearotypes to much.
202
posted on
07/27/2006 4:09:35 PM PDT
by
FloridianBushFan
(I support National Security. I SUPPORT HR4437 . Katherine Harris for Senate)
To: TheGunny
Actually no its not. Marines think they are all bad ass and so much better then the other services. That is far from the truth. Members of all branches have discipline and stick by their fellow sailors, airman and soldiers. There are bad apples in every branch of service including the Marines. Marines are no better then anyone else in fact sometimes far from it.
203
posted on
07/27/2006 4:12:51 PM PDT
by
FloridianBushFan
(I support National Security. I SUPPORT HR4437 . Katherine Harris for Senate)
To: FloridianBushFan
And your failure to understand that DADT is as far as the majority of Conservatives will go on this issue is because ___________?
Dropped on your head when young were you? Surprised to finally come up against limits on the advance of the homosexual agenda from true conservatives - are you? You are trolling your Red Herring and set up your Straw Man over and over like a broken record. What part about DADT to you not understand?
You violate DADT and get caught, you are out and that is just the way it is. If you follow DADT then nobody will mess with you. It's called CHOICE. I really don't care if Leftists don't like it. They can STFU, which is pretty much the only answer you can give to those "STUCK ON STUPID".
Whatever. This thread is gay enough without arguing with gay worshipers. Laterz - got important things to do.
To: Lucky Dog
Exactly.
If homos want to openly serve, be brave and heroic like the ACLU attorneys and get the nearest black robe judge to declare the UCMJ unconstitutional.
205
posted on
07/27/2006 4:26:09 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(Democrats soil institutions.)
To: Retired Army Special Forces
Just because you are against gays and don't support them doesn't mean you are a true conservative and just because I believe everyone who is able and want to should have the right to serve and defend their country doesn't make me a democrat. If that is the case then that means you are with the likes of Fred Phelps. Cause in your opinion he is a true conservative he hates gays. He doesn't think they should be in the military in fact he thinks the military is all pro gay. You to might just get along fine. But you do know he is a registered Democrat and a friend of Al Gore. He even hosted fund raisers for Gore and attended the 92 and 96 inaugurations. But hey you both despise gays so I guess either he is a true conservative by your definition or you are a Democrat like him.
206
posted on
07/27/2006 4:33:02 PM PDT
by
FloridianBushFan
(I support National Security. I SUPPORT HR4437 . Katherine Harris for Senate)
To: FloridianBushFan
Why did you not respond to post #165?
Comment #208 Removed by Moderator
To: Retired Army Special Forces
I think you assume that all gays have HIV. So I assume that if they don't have HIV you'd be okay with gays in the military? By the way there are ways to get HIV+ without being gay. I'd also not object to a HIV+ person interpreting plans to destroy us. We're talking about national security here.
To: little jeremiah
" more than 2 million soldiers, sailors and Marines dismissed for all reasons since 1993..."I am pretty sure that faked asvab scores, faked documents showing age, and financial or family irresponsibillity all make up a bigger chunk of that "all reasons" than homosexuality.
210
posted on
07/27/2006 6:03:04 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Any gun owner who votes for a democrat is too stupid to own a gun.)
To: Lucky Dog; Red Badger
Therefore, your speculation is in the same category of "if frogs had wings...."But it is unfair that frogs don't have wings. Frogs are kept from their rightfull place in the skies by intollerant hillbillies. They can fly just as good without wings. It is only your unfair biggotry that keeps them down, Dog. Why do you want them to all die? What gives you the right to say they should all be in hell? You hippocrit!!!
Just skipping all the intermediate flame steps /sarc
211
posted on
07/27/2006 6:29:17 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Any gun owner who votes for a democrat is too stupid to own a gun.)
To: MrEdd
Well, thanks for the short cut. It certainly clarifies the situation. Nonetheless, frogs still bump their butts.
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1; SmithL
Does learning arabic languages make you queer? ;-)It enables you to read the holy koran in the original, which...never mind.
213
posted on
07/27/2006 6:51:24 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Any gun owner who votes for a democrat is too stupid to own a gun.)
To: abercrombie_guy_38
Some of the attitudes/opinions on here are amazing. Such as people positing that differences in physical appearance are equivalent to differences in behavior.
214
posted on
07/27/2006 7:00:19 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Any gun owner who votes for a democrat is too stupid to own a gun.)
To: TheSuaveOne
Yeah, and just a few years prior to that the military kept the blacks in the kitchen was regular practice too...la Making up your own "historical facts" on the fly weakens your arguments. Also denigrating honorable infantrymen and cavalrymen by denying their very existence pisses some of us off.
Semper Fidelis
215
posted on
07/27/2006 7:18:46 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Any gun owner who votes for a democrat is too stupid to own a gun.)
To: Retired Army Special Forces
Heh, heh. You outed him in a heartbeat.
216
posted on
07/27/2006 7:26:48 PM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
To: MrEdd
It enables you to read the holy koran in the original, which...never mind. I saw Lawrence of Arabia. They said he went native.
To: TRY ONE
The only nerve you struck was that you never served in the US Military and what you just wrote about serving in a "foxhole" with a gayboy.
218
posted on
07/27/2006 8:33:23 PM PDT
by
ma bell
("Take me to Pristine. I want to see the "real terrorists", Former Marine)
To: ma bell
So does one need to be a Priest to decide if it's wrong to be a gay Priest lusting after little boys?!?!?!
219
posted on
07/28/2006 5:06:30 AM PDT
by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: SmithL; All
Military investigators wrote that Copas "engaged in at least three homosexual relationships, and is dealing with at least two jealous lovers, either of whom could be the anonymous source providing this information."So, by his actions as a gay man, he is disrupting the regular functioning of his unit (i.e. good order and discipline). He is no different than an officer sleeping with an enlisted man's wife. Both cause undue and extraneous (not related to the functioning of the command) stress within the unit, and should be cashiered pronto. Seems a simple and obvious case.
If anonymous emails accused a soldier of screwing one of the other soldier's wives, and he refused to deny it (because he actually did it), he'd be lucky to get an honorable discharge... in a perfect world...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 301-303 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson