Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy
Click2Houston commentator says this jury is probably more lenient and that the 'do you support the death penalty' question was not asked of them.

I've been listening to the coverage for the last 15 minutes or so and heard that too.From what I've heard,I think that means that no attempt was made to make the jury "death certified" which,I think,would be required if the state was seeking the death penalty.

My sense is that that's all it means.

18 posted on 07/26/2006 9:51:04 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

THe State was barred from seeking the Death Penalty because the original jury sentenced her to Life, and no new evidence was presented in this case. So, there was no need to ask the 'SUPPORT" question since there was no possibility of a Death Penalty sentence.


20 posted on 07/26/2006 9:53:01 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
The article has the answer why no death penalty considered:

A capital murder conviction in Texas carries either life in prison or the death penalty. Prosecutors could not seek death this time because the first trial's jurors sentenced her to life in prison, and authorities found no new evidence.

21 posted on 07/26/2006 9:53:53 AM PDT by CedarDave (Positive proof of global warming: http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a75/mommado/proof.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson