Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republicain
It's a mutual defense treaty among its member nations -- which is why NATO troops were dispatched to Afghanistan to topple the Taliban government after 9/11.

I may be wrong about this, but I'm quite certain there is nothing in the NATO bylaws that indicates the member nations only agree to come to each other's aid in the event of an attack by Warsaw Pact nations.

19 posted on 07/23/2006 11:23:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Of course. "Stop the Red Army ?" was a sarcasm...


22 posted on 07/23/2006 11:29:50 AM PDT by Republicain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
I may be wrong about this, but I'm quite certain there is nothing in the NATO bylaws that indicates the member nations only agree to come to each other's aid in the event of an attack by Warsaw Pact nations.

That would be correct. Though the constitutions or statutes of some of the individual nations prohibit their militaries from deployment outside Europe.

Germany is one of these. They couldn't send troops to Afghanistan...but they did send some naval units to the Mediterranean. I believe the Mediterranean littoral is considered within their sphere of operations, though, so German forces could be employed on the Israel-Lebanon border.

54 posted on 07/23/2006 10:11:50 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson