Posted on 07/20/2006 4:35:25 AM PDT by rdax
A new WSJ.com/Harris health-care poll indicates growing U.S. support for charging higher insurance premiums or out-of-pockets medical costs to people with unhealthy lifestyles.
The online survey of 2,325 U.S. adults found that 53% of Americans think it is fair to ask people with unhealthy lifestyles to pay higher insurance premiums than people with healthy lifestyles, while 32% said it would be unfair. When asked the same question in 2003, 37% said it would be fair, while 45% said it would be unfair. Healthy lifestyles were described as not smoking, exercising frequently and controlling one's weight.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Using your logic that smokers should pay more for their "unhealty lifestyle" then people with children should pay for use of childcare. I have no children, why should I pay for that?
And yeah, it's fine with me if liberals want to charge them more for their insurance ...
And while they're at it they can charge Gays more for their Social Security too. "Disability" payments for the AIDS infected isn't cheap.
Or are the liberals talking about people who use white sugar and live to be a hundred?
Ding! Ding! Give me back any taxes taken from me that did not benefit me. Thank You!
I hate bringing illegals to this, but if you (not you Mr. Brightside) really want to make a difference in premiums, stop charging me and every other LEGAL citizen of this country for the sh!t that illegals do. After that, let the consumer 'shop' for the best insurance for them.
But it's a big can of worms...
Besides that your questions won't deliver the results you are wanting.....
Then what?
Exactly.
A free-range chicken in every pot, and an exercise bike in every parlor...
Mr. bright will like this and so will all the nanny staters.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003139177_healthsurvey20m.html
Discounts???
What about just visiting a doctor when you're sick instead of wearing out his waiting room everytime a new disease hits the headlines?
Not all gay men climb skydivers.
Kindly explain or is it that you're just being greedy? The example I gave wouldn't cost you 1¢ more either way. The person "paying" for it is the employee if you won't reimburse the savings to the person not taking the benefit.
I hear there's a lot of steroid abuse that goes on in gyms and "health clubs". Maybe we need a tax on them to cover the health care costs associated with that.
"On the other hand, 80 percent of all lung cancer can be traced to smoking exposure"
You're speaking of primary lung cancer, not all lung cancer.
That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
If I have $100 budgeted for X, and for some reason it doesn't get spent on X, it is then available for the budget of Y. Still the same $100, just allocated to a different budget column.
And yeah, it's fine with me if liberals want to charge them more for their insurance ...
And while they're at it they can charge gay men more for their Social Security too. Disability payments for the AIDS infected isn't cheap.
Then there's the folks who don't pay their hospital bills and my insurance has to cover for them ... make everyone pay their own bills and that'll lower insurance costs.
Criminals? It's a dangerous business - not only can some homehowner shoot and injure a crimianl, but lots of them are drug addicted. They should pay more too.
If liberals really think the biggest problem is someone eating sugar and white bread, we need to raise their insurance rates -- stupid people have more health problems than smart people... or maybe, just maybe we can share each other burdens...
Such people would be greeted with a door slammed in their face if they showed up at my house. I'd greet them with a double-barrel, but that would probably be listed as "unhealthy".......these people are utterly nuts.
And steroids can make a person nutty - insurance to cover counseling for psychotic episodes can be verrrrry costly. Those "health club" folks are on my list... raise their rates.
Maybe I should be more interested in "sharing" Mr Brightsides "burden", but I'm having a hard time empathizing with a health club owner. I've got one of the greatest pieces of exercise equipment ever devised by man, and anyone else can have one for about $40 by simply walking into any good hardware store and asking for a "two-handled post hole digger".
Sorry, I was not specific...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.