Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tet68

Looks like the watertight compartments and damage control scheme worked, since the ship is still on top of the water and apparently still on an even keel.

You're right about the Phalanx engagement envelope - the Phalanx is mounted on the bow and a sea skimmer from a quartering angle would be occluded from the Phalanx system by the superstructure.

Maybe our naval architects will rethink their removal of Phalanx systems in favor of RAM launchers....


19 posted on 07/15/2006 3:32:39 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

The blast damage and blackening seems to me to indicate the missile came in at enough of an angle from the starboard side to allow the Phalanx to engage. I could easily be wrong and will have to wait for more data.


26 posted on 07/15/2006 3:37:03 PM PDT by Jeff Head (God, family, country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson