Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightinthemiddle

UPDATE: The U.S. House just voted down the King Amendment by voice vote. Congressman King immediately moved to have the vote be recorded by roll call, but the Rule on the bill didn't allow for roll call votes -- so we'll never know how Murtha voted.


8 posted on 07/13/2006 1:09:52 PM PDT by WeDontKnowJack (Suppose I were a Member of Congress. And suppose I were a moron. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: WeDontKnowJack; Just A Nobody; Coop

"

"UPDATE: The U.S. House just voted down the King Amendment by voice vote. Congressman King immediately moved to have the vote be recorded by roll call, but the Rule on the bill didn't allow for roll call votes -- so we'll never know how Murtha voted."



Actually, they did have a recorded vote, and Murtha voted AGAINST Congressman King's very commonsensical amendment:

"The amendment that would have extended the act for a decade, rather than the 25 years in the bill, was rejected 288-134. The proposal to strike requirements in the law that ballots in districts with large populations of non-English speakers be printed in other languages failed 238-185."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/13/AR2006071300369.html

Rollcall vote for amendment to eliminate bilingual-ballots requirement: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll372.xml


16 posted on 07/13/2006 4:50:55 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson