Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon Tests Novel Mileage Tax
Stateline.org ^ | Friday, May 20, 2005 | Eric Kelderman

Posted on 07/06/2006 1:25:43 PM PDT by proudofthesouth

I heard about the following on Fox News today and could hardly believe it. Thought fellow Freepers would be interested in this. After all, what starts in the western part of the U.S. usually heads eastward.

In 1919, Oregon was the first state to tax gasoline. This fall, the state will launch the nation's first high-tech experiment to tax drivers for the miles they travel rather than the gas they buy. The program is the first step in a long-term plan to replace the state's gasoline tax, which pays for about 40 percent of Oregon 's road projects. As in many states, Oregon officials are worried gas tax revenues won’t be able to keep up with the rising costs of road building, especially with improved mileage from both traditional and hybrid cards...............see link for rest of article

http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=136&languageId=1&contentId=32957

(Excerpt) Read more at stateline.org ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: gas; govwatch; mileage; tax; taxes; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: proudofthesouth

Utterly asinine. Gas taxes are better from both an efficiency and environmental standpoint. And if they aren't producing enough revenue (which I doubt), then just raise them. The only conceivable "advantage" of a mileage tax is that the government gets to track your movement.


41 posted on 07/06/2006 1:40:38 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

How about we ONLY charge hybrids this extra tax?

This is yet another success tax.

If you successfully have a vehicle that uses less gass you have to be penalized to protect the TAX REVENUE!

The politician who signs off on this should be shot out of office in a cannon.


42 posted on 07/06/2006 1:41:45 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
>>>total insanity - hard to believe residents there will put up with this, but then again - liberalism is a mental disorder.<<<

And you can bet the tax and tax government liberals in "Wonderful WA" are watching this very closely - we'll have it here in a heartbeat if the drones in Oregon put up with it!

43 posted on 07/06/2006 1:41:47 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Hey, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
I think no-helmet laws for motorcycles are a totally insane idea.

I'm a free marketeer. Really, but motorcycles and especially helmetless motorcylcists annoy me. Here's why. Suppose that gold-plating cars became a status symbol. And lots of people did it. But now, the average fender bender generated $80,000 in repair bills. What would happen? Insurance rates would skyrocket, and speed limits would probably come down.

Now, you might say, well, only if it's your fault would your insurance company have to pay the $80,000 to fix the gold-plated car. But no one's perfect. There are potholes, black ice, faulty brakes, etc. Right now, the expectation is that an average wreck will se the insurance company back a few thousand in property damage (there are also medical fees, but these would not be any different if a third of the cars were gold plated). In gold plated world, property damage would be significantly higher.

So back to motorcycles. I feel the same way about motorcycles as I would about gold plated cars. They cause the insurance rates to skyrocket for everyone else. If I'm in a 35 mph rear-ender with another car, it'll probably cost about $15,000 in damage to fix both cars, give or take. And whatever whiplash or whatever. But if I rear-end a motorcycle at 35 mph, the medical bills are probably going to be through the roof. Yes, I know all about personal responsibility and all, but there's still an expectation when driving about the damage that is a potential. At 65 mph, there's no guarantee that there's going to be no pothole, black ice, a sudden backup, whatever. You drive with these expectations in mind.

Think about it. If every fender bender were going to cause $80,000 in property damage, would you drive in the same manner as you do now? How is the motorcycle any different from a gold plated car?

44 posted on 07/06/2006 1:41:57 PM PDT by Koblenz (Holland: a very tolerant country. Until someone shoots you on a public street in broad daylight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth
This has been brewing for at least a couple of years. The technology exists now to track your car to within an inch or so. Just imagine the automatic parking tickets for those who don't park within six inches of the curb. For those who like to park and not feed the meter, but manage to dodge the (soon to be out of a job) meter maids and dudes. They are goinhg to be toast.`

Your car could easily be equipped with a camera to record your actions at all times. The future doesn't look too bright wrt personal privacy.

45 posted on 07/06/2006 1:42:23 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
The only conceivable "advantage" of a mileage tax is that the government gets to track your movement.

Nail...hammer...head!!!!!

46 posted on 07/06/2006 1:42:56 PM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Oh please, this is the idiotic state where you can't even pump your own gas. I wouldn't live in Oregon even if someone offered to pay me a million dollars. So there. Gee, my son and family just moved there. Which means I may have to visit, but I ain't staying.


47 posted on 07/06/2006 1:43:33 PM PDT by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
When did OR ever remove a tax?

When did any government remove a tax?

Case in point: If governments were really concerned about our health, they'd outlaw tobacco.But the taxes are far more addictive.

48 posted on 07/06/2006 1:45:00 PM PDT by llevrok ("Drink your beer, damnit! There are people in Africa sober.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth
When drivers fill up, specially equipped gas pumps will read the mileage and charge 1.2 cents for every mile driven instead of the state's tax of 24 cents per gallon of gas. The cars also will have Global Positioning Systems (GPS) so drivers will not be charged for driving outside state borders -- the tax is only meant to be applied for use of Oregon roads. Tracking cars' locations also could allow extra fees for traveling in congested traffic areas or during rush hours

This is going the way of the BTU tax and going nowhere. First, it requires mods to all cars. Secondly, this system would have to charge a person only for incremental miles driven since last fill up while also not charging them if they drive outside Oregon. This would require an enormous amount of detail tracking per automobile. I don't even see how this is possible unless the system continously uploads miles driven to a computer and alerts the system that the car has left Oregon or has just entered Oregon.

A simpler solution for the politicians to just campaign for higher gas taxes. Tree huggers out there probably go for it.

49 posted on 07/06/2006 1:45:56 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

DING! DING! DING! and we have a winner!!!!

This is EXACTLY what this tax is about...


50 posted on 07/06/2006 1:46:12 PM PDT by fhlh (Polls are for Strippers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth

For a state that is populated by tree huggers, it strikes me as curious that this "user fee" would actually level the playing field between hybrid vehicles and Chevy Suburbans. Who is the friggin idiot that came up with this one. The greenies (who generally love to tax stuff) must be freaking out over this one.


51 posted on 07/06/2006 1:46:36 PM PDT by nuckledragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
What about drivers who don't live in the state, who just drive through?

I guess they will pay a gas tax, as they do now. I wouldn't be surprised to see the tax go up in order to stick it to the out-of-staters. I'm moving to Oregon within the next couple of years, and this just makes me cringe. I almost feel sorry for the people who are spending thousands of dollars extra to get a hybrid, thinking that they will eventually recoup the extra cost. They never will with this plan.

52 posted on 07/06/2006 1:46:56 PM PDT by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
"Here in Ohio, motercyclists (with a loud lobbying group) aren't required to have helmets, but my six-year-old bike riding daughter is. What's up with that?"

Your daughter, and your other children, if any, and your wife and you should be wearing a helmet when riding a bicycle! It isn't a matter of freedom or personal rights, it is a matter of life and death!

Sheesh!

53 posted on 07/06/2006 1:47:11 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (¡Salga de los Estados Unidos de América, invasor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

"if buying gas is so bad for the enviroment why not encourage those to get hybrid or hydrogen vehecles with a tax break, this is just the governments way of making sure they get their cut once we move away from fossil fuels and a GAS tax..."

My thinking exactly!


54 posted on 07/06/2006 1:47:28 PM PDT by WOSG (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth
1.2 cents per mile? Don't sound like much but....

I get 24 mpg in my gas hog right now. That would be 24 cents per gallon under the old system. Under the new system it would be 1.2 x 24 miles or 28.8 cents.

Hmmm, to me that looks like a tax increase of 20%?
55 posted on 07/06/2006 1:47:58 PM PDT by PeteB570 (Sharia. Coming to a town near you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
When did any government remove a tax?

Actually last month the phone tax that was started dating back to the Spanish American war was. It just took a very long time but your point is correct.

56 posted on 07/06/2006 1:47:58 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Nanny Statists are Ameba's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: All

GPS jammers

and

equal protection suits


This is like that asinine impact tax that FL had under the democrat governor. Vehicles from out of state paid an extra tax. This will be an instate only tax which ONLY residents pay for the same goods and services.


57 posted on 07/06/2006 1:48:02 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
Mandated GPS unit's in all cars...

Might be a strong deterrent to car theft.

58 posted on 07/06/2006 1:48:59 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

Sounds to me like this is a way to get MORE money, as, apparently, the gas tax isn't generating enough revenues to take care of the state's highway system.


59 posted on 07/06/2006 1:50:54 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
Absolutely, ... It will take LEO's about 30 New York Seconds to discover a new source of revenue.
60 posted on 07/06/2006 1:51:09 PM PDT by Lokibob (Spelling and typos are copyrighted. Please do not use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson