Hawking is always newsworthy. I added the bold font and underlining.
Happy 4th to all.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
| SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
2 posted on
07/04/2006 4:30:18 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
To: PatrickHenry
I already had all of this solved the last universe we were all in, but somehow, the info keeps getting lost. ;)
To: PatrickHenry
"anthropic principle" hmmmm.. So the universe is uniquely oriented to allow life. (In addition to he cosmological constant, there are over ten constant numbers, for which a small change in any of them, would preclude life). Anthropomorphism is the poet's license to apply human qualities to a moon, a stream, an animal or tree. Seems to be a humanistic, secular bias here, I guess Hawking wants to be published as much as anybody else. If had called it the "genesis principle," even Mr. Hawking would be ostracized.
On the seventh day he rested, and it was good.
5 posted on
07/04/2006 4:58:17 AM PDT by
mission9
(Be a citizen worth living for, in a Nation worth dying for...)
To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop
8 posted on
07/04/2006 5:24:44 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: PatrickHenry
So the current universe must have "chosen" the histories that led to the "correct" value and the precise conditions that brought life into existence??? I meant to say the Current Universe. But now we're back where we started. Anybody who tries to teach this in the public schools is in for trouble from the ACLU and the rest of the atheistic Left.
15 posted on
07/04/2006 7:34:56 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George Bush and his supurb leadership.)
To: PatrickHenry
17 posted on
07/04/2006 7:45:28 AM PDT by
Bratch
To: PatrickHenry
Hawking and Hertog also say their model could be tested Any mechanical model could be tested. That doesn't add anything to the possibility that they are finally tuned into ultimate reality.
18 posted on
07/04/2006 7:48:52 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: PatrickHenry
I'm curious...
I know Stephen Hawking is not a climatologist (duh), but doesn anyone know if he's ever weighed in on global warming?
23 posted on
07/04/2006 8:21:01 AM PDT by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: PatrickHenry
We Were Discussing Stephen Hawking Just This Morning Pinggggggggg. . .
26 posted on
07/04/2006 9:35:40 AM PDT by
Flyer
(Don't question the questioner)
To: pax_et_bonum
We Were Discussing Stephen Hawking Just This Morning Pinggggggggg. . .
And this time I ping the right person.
27 posted on
07/04/2006 9:36:57 AM PDT by
Flyer
(Don't question the questioner)
To: PatrickHenry; Physicist; RadioAstronomer; Quark2005
Sounds like Hawking is taking a page from Robert Laughlin's book.
28 posted on
07/04/2006 9:39:53 AM PDT by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
33 posted on
06/10/2008 8:53:12 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_________________________Profile updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
