Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eraser2005

Ironically, I think the military tribunals were an attempt to appease the Left and give the detainees a little bit of due process.

The civil courts have no jurisdiction over the detainees, which complicates matters - and even if the civil courts could hear the detainees cases, their crimes were committed outside the scope of the civil courts, so the only verdict possible in a civil court would be a mistrial, and an order to release.

Which only further enlightens us to what the Left is trying to gain here at the expense of the war on terror. They see an opportunity to injure the President and will do everything possible, up to and including causing the release of hundreds of enemy combatants from our custody, to do so.

If not for the Left's insistence for due process for the prisoners, the review boards initially used probably would've stuck.


497 posted on 06/29/2006 8:46:20 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies ]


To: coconutt2000
If not for the Left's insistence for due process for the prisoners, the review boards initially used probably would've stuck.

I agree.

515 posted on 06/29/2006 8:53:11 AM PDT by syriacus (Superfunds aren't needed, since ONE WORD from Dems neutralizes lethal chemicals -- "RUST")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson